Comments for Vegas Gang Podcast http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com Las Vegas and Casino Gaming Roundtable Podcast Sun, 19 Aug 2018 08:02:55 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=4.5.24 Comment on About by BestMinnie http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/about/comment-page-1/#comment-1996 Sun, 19 Aug 2018 08:02:55 +0000 #comment-1996 I see you don’t monetize your page, don’t waste your traffic, you can earn extra bucks
every month. You can use the best adsense alternative for any type of website (they approve all websites),
for more details simply search in gooogle: boorfe’s tips
monetize your website

]]>
Comment on About by FirstKarri http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/about/comment-page-1/#comment-1927 Sat, 30 Dec 2017 04:06:49 +0000 #comment-1927 I see you don’t monetize your page, don’t waste your traffic, you can earn additional bucks
every month because you’ve got hi quality content.
If you want to know how to make extra bucks, search for: Boorfe’s
tips best adsense alternative

]]>
Comment on About by Elena1992 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/about/comment-page-1/#comment-1836 Sun, 28 May 2017 15:11:40 +0000 #comment-1836 This post is on 11 spot in google’s search results, if you want more visitors, you should build more backlinks to your blog, there
is one trick to get free, hidden backlinks from authority forums, search on youtube: how to get
hidden backlinks from forums

]]>
Comment on Thanks, Gang! by Mitesh Damania http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2017/03/thanks-gang/comment-page-1/#comment-1821 Sun, 09 Apr 2017 03:24:51 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=403#comment-1821 Thanks for the good times.

]]>
Comment on Thanks, Gang! by bob http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2017/03/thanks-gang/comment-page-1/#comment-1816 Tue, 04 Apr 2017 07:37:11 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=403#comment-1816 I enjoyed it and learned a lot. Thank you.

]]>
Comment on Thanks, Gang! by motoman http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2017/03/thanks-gang/comment-page-1/#comment-1814 Sat, 01 Apr 2017 10:07:17 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=403#comment-1814 Thanks for the fun times, Hunter!

This show, along with your blog, were the beginnings of my Vegas fandom. While I’d hoped you might still crank out an annual VIMPF episode, I understand the desire to move on.

There were indeed some great interviews with industry bigwigs, and I especially liked the “Meet the Gangsters” episodes where you interviewed each of your cohosts (and were yourself interviewed by Mr. Five Hundy). It was great to hear each of your backstories. In particular, your fortunately timed interview of Jeff Simpson will be required listening for anyone writing his biography some day.

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #131 – May 18th, 2016 by Ashley http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2016/05/vegas-gang-131-may-18th-2016/comment-page-1/#comment-1680 Mon, 30 May 2016 10:15:07 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=383#comment-1680 I have a question, and I understand if you don’t want to answer this because it’s politics, but here goes anyway.

If Donald Trump wins the election in November, then the USA will have a president who has vowed to impose tariffs on imports from China, and who has engaged in a bit of anti-china rhetoric which probably hasn’t gone over too well in Beijing. Assuming that Trump tried to introduce the tariffs and play hardball with China on trade, what do think the implications are for the American gaming companies in Macau – i.e would the Chinese government push back somehow and if so, how?

I’m aware that Macau is autonomous to a large degree, but I assume that the Chinese Central Government can bring pressure to bear on the territory if they really want to.

Just Curious

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #130 – May 17th, 2016 by rob@skyyontherocks http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2016/05/vegas-gang-130-may-17th-2016/comment-page-1/#comment-1672 Fri, 20 May 2016 16:08:12 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=381#comment-1672 In regards to Steve Wynn, I think I commented to John Hall at VIMFP 2015 that it seems there is a love/hate relationship with Wynn. The reality is that history will, and should be kind to Steve Wynn for his entire body of work as it relates to LV and the casino/resort industry in general. He will go down as someone who had a tremendous influence in making Las Vegas great and different than anywhere else.
It just seems that in his current reality, he is missing “it”. Compare him to Warren Buffett. When Buffett has an idea, or is involved in an acquisition, or is asked for his opinion, his remarks are relevant, and they resonate within the ranks of his audience. There is just something off with Steve in his visions and his ability to communicate: Just my opinion.
Great show. I like the new format but admit I miss the music and the “sure bet” segment. Thank you for providing me this entertainment.

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #129 – April 2nd, 2016 by MrEinSantaCruz http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2016/04/vegas-gang-129-april-2nd-2016/comment-page-1/#comment-1665 Sat, 16 Apr 2016 08:47:50 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=378#comment-1665 I really enjoyed this interview and was lucky enough to get to be there in person. Mr Pascal gave great insight into his management philosophy and what he wants to build without saying very much about what kind of Hotel experience he’s looking to bring to the strip. From the team he’s putting together, I have my fingers crossed that he will try to recapture a little of the magic from the first 7-8 months of Encore. Also I totally agree with Rob, Hunter your interview skills are great, you’ve come along way since your interview with George Maloof in 2008 at the first Podcast-a-palooza. Keep up the great work you guys ! Hopefully I’ll see you at VIMFP

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #129 – April 2nd, 2016 by rob@skyyontherocks http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2016/04/vegas-gang-129-april-2nd-2016/comment-page-1/#comment-1662 Sat, 09 Apr 2016 21:50:41 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=378#comment-1662 I was fortunate to be able to make this live event. The conversation was very interesting. He is not going to tip his hand. He had to answer the big question and that was about funding. He did not shy away from that and even cited it as one of the many things he is worried about; even saying its on the top or near the top of the list. He did not hold back in his admiration fro Elaine and the members of his team. I might have been disappointed if he disclosed any more details; its not time yet. On a side note, I have seen Hunter in action now holding live interviews several times. He is always prepared, courteous yet direct, and as good as I have seen anywhere.

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #129 – April 2nd, 2016 by admin http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2016/04/vegas-gang-129-april-2nd-2016/comment-page-1/#comment-1659 Mon, 04 Apr 2016 18:44:09 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=378#comment-1659 Cross posting from VT since the top poster did the same:

Hi,

Thanks for the comments. Sorry if you didn’t find it interesting.

I don’t equate value with cheapness. There are many things that are expensive that offer tremendous value. There are many cheap things that do not have value. It does seem that Alon is aiming at the higher end of the market but that doesn’t mean they can’t create a product of value for those customers.

They’ve assembled a truly top-notch team. The best of the best. If they don’t succeed in the market it won’t be because they didn’t have a carefully considered plan.

I think some of the questions you were hoping to get answers for – reasonably priced shows or restaurants, obtainable comps and even the rules in the casino – are an interesting lens with which to analyze what they are potentially trying to do. Based on the vibe I’ve gotten, I think they are going for customers who are looking for a different type of experience and likely one where those sorts of questions are less important. I don’t mean to sound like a prick – not all products are for all consumers and one of the best things about Vegas is that there are so many options.

I’ve found Andrew to be exceedingly interesting and if that didn’t come across then I failed to some degree and for that I apologize. Thanks for listening.

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #129 – April 2nd, 2016 by Paul Shanahan http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2016/04/vegas-gang-129-april-2nd-2016/comment-page-1/#comment-1658 Mon, 04 Apr 2016 05:00:22 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=378#comment-1658 Great interview. Andrew Pascal and his partners needs to raise at least $1.5 billions dollars to build Alon so doing this interview was a very good idea. Mr. Pascal talks about “individual entrepreneurs” and how Las Vegas used to be in the past and that is part of the reason why Derek Stevens has been so successful with The D in downtown Las Vegas. Mr. Stevens is on the casino floor meeting people and shaking hands and Mr. Pascal says he will do this also if Alon gets built.

Between MGM Resorts International and Caesars Entertainment they own 19 hotel-casinos in Las Vegas and have around 65,000 hotel rooms so something different like Alon might work. Hiring Jesse Waits away from Wynn to run the
nightlife operations at Alon was a fantastic idea. The nightclubs and restaurants are the two main reasons Las Vegas is extremely popular today. Alon has a great location across the Strip from Wynn and Encore so hopefully this gets built.

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #129 – April 2nd, 2016 by Johnnyvan447 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2016/04/vegas-gang-129-april-2nd-2016/comment-page-1/#comment-1657 Sun, 03 Apr 2016 17:57:43 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=378#comment-1657 Vegas Gang,

Andrew Pascal was the worst interview in Vegas Gang history. The guy gave no information other than self absorbed love of himself. He waxed on about offering what Vegas used to have and mentioned value and customer service. I cannot imagine elon will offer any value to anyone but the very wealthy. Will there be reasonably priced shows or dinners, good rules and pay tables in the casino, reasonably obtainable comps? The guy refused to answer any question in a straight forward direct manner. He was painful. I could not get through it all.

I commend you for trying by coming from different angles in your questions. Unfortunately, he simply did not get the point of interviews–sharing ideas and the transfer of information.

Rant over.

Thank you!

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #127 – January 20th, 2016 by Paul Shanahan http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2016/01/vegas-gang-127-january-20th-2016/comment-page-1/#comment-1606 Sat, 23 Jan 2016 09:52:32 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=367#comment-1606 David Bowie was a fantastic musician, Starman is my favorite Bowie song which has a great guitar riff.

These sentences are from an extremely well written newspaper article in the Financial Times from September 4, 2010 written by Paul Morley entitled “The Importance of David Bowie”:

David Bowie’s impact as a musician, as a brand, as a sign of the times, has been as great as Dylan and the Beatles, his influence as an otherworldly pop star actually greater, and if you just want one example of what he got up to as this erudite pop combination of shaman, singer, thinker and shameless self-promoter, then his album Station to Station is as good a place to start as any. Inside six years, since 1970, David Bowie has been a psychedelic music hall singer channelling Syd Barrett and Anthony Newley, a whimsical novelty specialist, surreal folkie, risqué glam rock starman, cosmic wizard, apocalyptic androgynous Diamond Dog and a blanked-out white soul man flirting with superstardom.

RIP David Bowie

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #126 – December 31st, 2015 by Paul Shanahan http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2015/12/vegas-gang-126-december-31st-2015/comment-page-1/#comment-1592 Mon, 04 Jan 2016 03:35:41 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=364#comment-1592 Actually there were 5.2 million conventioneers in Las Vegas in 2014 and if you divide that by 41 million visitors it comes out to
around 12%.

Howard Stutz predictions article for 2016 said this: Here’s a shot in the dark: merger talks might heat up between two unusual partners — Genting and Wynn. A deal would give Wynn a location in Singapore — a market he coveted — and Genting a foothold into Macau. Macquarie Securities gaming analyst Chad Beynon liked the idea but considered it a long shot.

This is interesting also because Wynn would be part of the Resorts World Las Vegas project that Genting might start construction on sometime this year. $4 billion dollars seems like a lot of money for this ambitious project but with Steelman Partners designing Resorts World Las Vegas this should turn out fantastic.

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #126 – December 31st, 2015 by Paul Shanahan http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2015/12/vegas-gang-126-december-31st-2015/comment-page-1/#comment-1591 Sat, 02 Jan 2016 06:32:35 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=364#comment-1591 Aria will have 500,000 square feet of convention space once the new convention space is completed and in 2014 9% of the 41 million visitors to Las Vegas attended a convention/trade show. MGM Resorts International is also building a new 5,000 seat concert venue next door at the Monte Carlo so they probably think they already have enough entertainment options in Las Vegas.

Interesting topic about the new You Tube/social media stars that the Palms is promoting. This is a good idea for the Palms because they are 1 mile or so west of the Strip and it gives people a reason to visit their property.

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #126 – December 31st, 2015 by detroit1051 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2015/12/vegas-gang-126-december-31st-2015/comment-page-1/#comment-1590 Fri, 01 Jan 2016 02:01:52 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=364#comment-1590 One of the oddest Vegas Gang Podcasts yet (Not that there’s anything wrong with that.) Very interesting. Too much to remember, but:

Imo, the future of Vegas entertainment will be huge celebrity shows like at Caesars now and planned for Las Vegas Arena. Ticket sites already have events listed through January 2017. There is no need for Aria to have a theater once MGM Resorts controls big names coming into Vegas.

After reading about Encore Players Club on VegasTripping, hearing you guys talk about it and looking at it on Wynn’s site, I still don’t get it. However, one of you said something that makes a lot of sense. If it is successful, it may be expanded to take over Encore’s casino. That would leave Wynn’s casino as the traditional high roller place for older, more conservative clientele.

I’ve been following the Adelson newspaper saga closely, and I believe you’re going to see a huge turnover of reporters and editors because they have integrity and won’t bend under Adelson. Either they’ll leave on principle or will get pushed out by Adelson’s henchmen. Journalism has to be a tough business in a one-industry town, sort of like Detroit newspapers in the glory decades of the Big 3 auto manufacturers in the ’50s and ’60s.

Wish I felt as confident about Resorts World as some of you.

Thanks for another great year of Vegas Gang; looking forward to all the new episodes in 2016!

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #125 – November 12th, 2015 by Howard Park http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2015/11/vegas-gang-125-november-12th-2015/comment-page-1/#comment-1588 Wed, 25 Nov 2015 01:49:37 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=361#comment-1588 I like the new format. Have fun!

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #125 – November 12th, 2015 by HillBilly http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2015/11/vegas-gang-125-november-12th-2015/comment-page-1/#comment-1587 Sun, 22 Nov 2015 06:42:42 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=361#comment-1587 Parking. The argument that most cities charge for parking just doesn’t hold up very well for the strip. Even comparing downtown to the strip doesn’t hold up.

The strip exists entirely as a resort destination. There is no other reason to go there other than to spend money in the casinos and hotels. Traditional cities that charge for parking are a huge mix of residential, industrial, and entertainment. This is why paying for parking downtown makes sense. There are many people there coming to work everyday for the government offices and businesses. If the hotels did not charge to park, these folks would fill up the garages and displace paying customers.

The garages are already in place. Adding a parking fee is just gouging a captive audience. It’s one more thing that erodes value. The corporate mafias running this town will keep doing it until the value is gone and then Vegas stops being unique.

I pretty much never have a car in Vegas so this will not directly affect me. To say it won’t affect me at all, however, would be short sighted as it ignores the larger issue at hand. I have been hollering for a decade now about the attitude shift in the town where everybody expects a hand out just for existing. Charging people to park for coming to spend money at your resort is just so… Disney.

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #125 – November 12th, 2015 by Paul Shanahan http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2015/11/vegas-gang-125-november-12th-2015/comment-page-1/#comment-1586 Sun, 22 Nov 2015 04:56:44 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=361#comment-1586 I like the new show format because there are always numerous events/happenings going on in Las Vegas and you guys get to discuss more topics now.

As for W Las Vegas being part of SLS it will help in the long run
because of W’s customer base but it seems to me that any company will have problems there because of the challenging location. At least now SLS’s neighbor Carl Icahn has put Fontainebleau on the market (for $650 million dollars) so maybe something will happen there.

The MGM charging money for parking rumors are interesting. I originally posted on another blog that I thought they would do this but now I am not sure. What is likely possible is that when the Las Vegas Arena opens in April of 2016 customers going to concerts there will be charged $10 to park at the nearby hotels which include Excalibur, New York New York and Monte Carlo.

Eventually I think there will be an NHL Hockey Team in the Las Vegas Arena. With 40 home games (and possibly the playoffs) they would charge either $15 or $20 to park at Excalibur, New York New York and Monte Carlo.

In the United States most cities charge money for parking
when either going to a concert or a sporting event. Since most people who live in Las Vegas are from somewhere else I think most people will not have a problem with this at all.

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #125 – November 12th, 2015 by Bill Palmer http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2015/11/vegas-gang-125-november-12th-2015/comment-page-1/#comment-1585 Wed, 18 Nov 2015 21:01:02 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=361#comment-1585 I’ll own up to it. This news hurts a bit. This has been my favorite podcast (Vegas or non-Vegas) for several years…nothing better than a fresh Vegas Gang popping up in my Stitcher app. Personally, I loved the “newsy” aspect of the podcast…and the deep-dive level that you would occasionally get-into. Even back in the day when Jeff would spend 25 minutes on some long diatribe, talking at his kind of deliberate pace, I’d hang on every word. I’m nerdy enough about the casino/gaming business that I probably WOULD listen to the EBITDA Gang. I think that type of discussion has separated this from what others do, and made this podcast unique. So yea, I will miss that.

That said, yes, the hosts MUST enjoy the discussion in order to do it. I totally get it. This isn’t your “job”, and you make nothing for it. Therefore, you owe us nothing. Of course I’ll listen, because a.) you’re my boys and b.) hearing the three of you bullshit about whatever you feel like is certainly going to be plenty interesting to me.

So thanks for not giving up on this completely. I look forward to what’s this evolves into.

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #125 – November 12th, 2015 by detroit1051 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2015/11/vegas-gang-125-november-12th-2015/comment-page-1/#comment-1584 Wed, 18 Nov 2015 17:40:49 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=361#comment-1584 New format is great; fast paced, focused segments. Audio quality is best ever.

So glad Dr. Dave talked about 442nd Regimental Combat Team. I had somehow missed it in Green Felt Journal. I had just watched a frightening CSPAN or PBS documentary on children sent to interment camps, and it was great that Dave recognized these Americans.

The Jimbo on Twitter segment is hilarious. Thanks, Chuck.

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #124 – October 17th, 2015 by detroit1051 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2015/10/vegas-gang-124-october-17th-2015/comment-page-1/#comment-1528 Thu, 22 Oct 2015 12:51:33 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=357#comment-1528 Best interview yet. Excellent work by Vegas Gang. I gave my comment on Vegastripping.com

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #124 – October 17th, 2015 by Las Vegas | A Look Into The Future Of Las Vegas Club | TravelZork http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2015/10/vegas-gang-124-october-17th-2015/comment-page-1/#comment-1527 Thu, 22 Oct 2015 09:05:40 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=357#comment-1527 […] The rumors about the new name appear to be premature. Over the weekend Derek Stevens said that it’s too early to even think about names and themes for the casino. On a live recording of the Vegas Gang Podcast Stevens discussed the future of one of the oldest casino-hotels in Las Vegas. [Link to Podcast Vegas Gang #124] […]

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #123 – August 12th, 2015 by detroit1051 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2015/08/vegas-gang-123-august-12th-2015/comment-page-1/#comment-1517 Fri, 14 Aug 2015 00:26:49 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=355#comment-1517 I was staying at The Hilton when Monte Carlo opened. We went, and my reaction was, “there is no there there.” No Wow factor. If MGM is going after millenials, they need to change the name. How many millenials even associate the name Monte Carlo with the glamor of Europe and Monaco? The entertainment center and arena are both great ideas, but what is MGM’s hook to bring in younger visitors? On the other hand, what do I know about millenials?

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #122 – July 3rd, 2015 by Jay http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2015/07/vegas-gang-122-july-3rd-2015/comment-page-1/#comment-1515 Fri, 10 Jul 2015 17:59:58 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=352#comment-1515 I would like to second Dr Dave’s comment about Dr Michael Green and a note or two. I have heard him speak on at least 20 different occasions.

You would be amazed at how many positive traits this man has that Dave also has. First of all they are both very knowledgeable on Nevada. They are both a pleasure to listen to. They both have a great sense of humor, they both speak very well, they are both captivating, they both have an unmistakable voice, and you can’t get enough of their stories when they are speaking. And of course, they are both a pleasure to talk to outside of the spotlight.

I think Vegas Gang should look him up and put his name in the hat for a VIMFP special guest or at least a VIP attendee…or maybe as a podcast guest. His discussion skills are top notch. I don’t know his drinking habits or how he would warm up to the atmosphere of VIMFP. I do know that if you wanted someone to speak 15 or 20 minutes on casino history, mob men, casino owners, or city fathers, or the passing of a LV dignitary, he could hold the crowd in the palm of his hands.

He doesn’t look like Dave, sound like Dave, or act like Dave, but he shares so many great qualities, you’ll wonder if they are related.

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #122 – July 3rd, 2015 by Hunter http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2015/07/vegas-gang-122-july-3rd-2015/comment-page-1/#comment-1514 Fri, 10 Jul 2015 15:21:01 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=352#comment-1514 Hi Dan,

We’ve spent a LOT of time in the past talking about the disaster of CityCenter’s opening. A lot.

As far as the takeover of Mirage Resorts, how does that have any bearing on him being un-saintly?

A guy died. We talked about it. There are no saints.

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #122 – July 3rd, 2015 by Dan Short http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2015/07/vegas-gang-122-july-3rd-2015/comment-page-1/#comment-1513 Fri, 10 Jul 2015 11:39:17 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=352#comment-1513 Love the show but you continue to deify Krekorian. Why no comment on his hostile takeover of Steve Wynn’s properties? Or his desperate bailout of City centre? Or the original MGM fire? He was not a saint.

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #122 – July 3rd, 2015 by Bob http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2015/07/vegas-gang-122-july-3rd-2015/comment-page-1/#comment-1510 Tue, 07 Jul 2015 07:20:21 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=352#comment-1510 I have not finished the yet but I have a question. You did an interesting segment on who the enew CEO from Ceasar’s should talk to. Can you consider asking some of those people onto a segment as a guest. I realize Jim Murran and the CEO types probably will not do it and that some of them may have already done shows with you. But, for example, John Akers (?), the guy who says the slot is dead, would be an interesting segment.

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #122 – July 3rd, 2015 by Paul Shanahan http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2015/07/vegas-gang-122-july-3rd-2015/comment-page-1/#comment-1509 Mon, 06 Jul 2015 04:45:47 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=352#comment-1509 I also thought Alon would be bigger than 1100 rooms but at least the hotel rooms should be pretty big. Since James Packer is Australian I really like the PMS colors in Australia’s flag (PMS 280 Blue and PMS 185 Red) instead of what they have in the rendering.

As Dr. Schwartz said gambling has not been growing as much in Las Vegas. There are casinos in lots and lots of states now because states need tax revenue. Consequently that is part of the reason why the LVCVA bought the Riviera earlier this year and are planning to build the Las Vegas Global Business District there.

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #122 – July 3rd, 2015 by Danny Z http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2015/07/vegas-gang-122-july-3rd-2015/comment-page-1/#comment-1508 Sat, 04 Jul 2015 23:01:59 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=352#comment-1508 SLS is a fascinating place for me. My wife and I stayed there during Rock in Rio and a ton of people definitely walked THROUGH the doors but did not stick around at all. I’ve never seen a place fail to capitalize on an audience delivered to your doorstep so poorly… they tried to do more the 2nd weekend but it was too little too late. The hotel was nice enough (we stayed in the World Tower), but a cup of coffee stayed in the hallway 2 of our 3 days there. NO ONE we asked knew how to reset the clock (Bell, Housekeeping, Housekeeping Supervisor, random security guy) until the housekeeper on check out day.

I actually enjoyed gambling there but I agree with Chuck that the food options did run their course quickly. The limited markets that they just latch on to and won’t let go are forcing the failure… why did they have people waiting behind a velvet rope for the pool when there was NO ONE AT THE POOL???

I think reworking the F&B and retail would be a HUGE first step. Monkey Bar and Center Bar always had a crowd…take a cue from these and make your nightlife accessible to people who want to have a drink and talk. And let Fred Segal go…i couldn’t believe we could not room charge from these outlets OR the gift shop. To charge from the gift shop they had to run the charge through the front desk which took at least 10 minutes. Won some money and was going to treat the wife to a minor piece of jewelry (300 bucks) but wanted to room charge and pay off at checkout. NOPE. No can do. Well no sale for you then.

I haven’t finished the episode so the answer might be in there but I’m curious what type of demographic shift might be necessary to pull in the gamblers. What should SLS’s target market be? What types of changes would bring in this market?

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #122 – July 3rd, 2015 by detroit1051 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2015/07/vegas-gang-122-july-3rd-2015/comment-page-1/#comment-1507 Sat, 04 Jul 2015 17:44:52 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=352#comment-1507 Dave, it would be great if you could interview Frissora. We’d learn a lot more about him than what’s on Google. I hope he succeeds. Someone must believe his strengths are financial and leadership, and that he will right the ship.

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #122 – July 3rd, 2015 by Dave http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2015/07/vegas-gang-122-july-3rd-2015/comment-page-1/#comment-1506 Sat, 04 Jul 2015 15:08:07 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=352#comment-1506 The question is, what do the people who have billions invested in the company see in him? There must be something.

I’d be curious to learn how many names rise to the top in an executive search at this level. Who gets interviewed? What are they looking for?

I’ve reached out to try to set up an interview, maybe as a “Seven Questions.” Hopefully we can learn more.

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #122 – July 3rd, 2015 by detroit1051 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2015/07/vegas-gang-122-july-3rd-2015/comment-page-1/#comment-1505 Sat, 04 Jul 2015 12:34:08 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=352#comment-1505 Great discussion on Caesars and its new CEO, Mark Frissora. After reading a little about Frissora’s background as CEO of Tenneco and more recently, Hertz, I hope he’s the right person. He had some real critics at Hertz, including Carl Icahn. I always get suspicious when someone in his prime resigns for “personal reasons”.

I agree with Dr. Dave, Frissora should talk with Derek Stevens, not to learn from Derek, but to see what Derek really thinks of Frissora. They both have somewhat similar backgrounds outside gaming. Obviously, I know that Derek would not share his personal thoughts publicly, but it sure would be interesting.

It’s unanimous that Caesars should dump Rio, but if it were easy, it would have been done long ago. I also agree with Dr. Dave that Bally’s, Paris and Planet Hollywood don’t add to the corporation. I’d like to see Caesars focus on Caesars Palace, and the properties on the east side of the Strip north of Flamingo. I haven’t spent a lot of time in Caesars in recent years, but I believe it’s the one property that still has some of its former, glory years high-end attributes. There are enough mid-market properties in Vegas and regionally, that Caesars Palace should try to be be the equal of Wynn/Encore and Bellagio. That’s where the focus should be.

This piece on Frissora is positive, but it’s from McKinsey, a consulting firm.
http://www.mckinsey.com/insights/strategy/leading_in_the_21st_century_an_interview_with_hertz_ceo_mark_frissora

The second one, from Forbes, is pretty brutal.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/nathanvardi/2014/08/21/hedge-fund-fir-tree-partners-blasts-hertz-ceo/

I can’t wait for Vegas Gang to do its performance review of Frissora a year from now.

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #121 – May 9th, 2015 by bob http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2015/05/vegas-gang-121-may-9th-2015/comment-page-1/#comment-1500 Mon, 18 May 2015 11:50:30 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=340#comment-1500 There is an old rule of the thumb on the lodging business that you need to make 1/1000 of the cost of a room a night to make a profit.
Casinos are obviously different because of the gaming revenue streams but if you add them in the rule basically applies.

So if you build a 1,000 room casino for 500 million the cost of a room is $500,000. You need to gross $500 between the room and the gaming drop.

I off the top of my head don’t know how much a room at the Wynn cost to build but I do now that at the Sands it was roughly $1,000,000 a room. The last time I looked Sands was getting about $450 a night from gaming and room revenues.

There is now way someone can put up a luxury casino in Las Vegas for half the cost of the Sands properties. Building a luxury casino in this environment is madness.

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #121 – May 9th, 2015 by Paul Shanahan http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2015/05/vegas-gang-121-may-9th-2015/comment-page-1/#comment-1499 Fri, 15 May 2015 10:44:11 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=340#comment-1499 Another great episode. You guys bring up a good topic when discussing if Steve Wynn will build a brand new hotel-casino in Las Vegas. Steve Wynn is the modern day (and best) original developer in Las Vegas and Resorts World and Elan are coming in to his neighborhood on the Strip. The Fontainebleau location
is a possibility, a brand new Wynn III hotel-casino would probably take around 5 years to complete.

I also recently read that the 18 acre site on the Strip where the Elvis themed casino was supposed to be built (across from City Center and just south of Planet Hollywood) is for sale by Spectrum Group Management LLC. The 18 acres there though abuts up to the Polo Towers which makes the property less attractive to most buyers. I doubt Steve Wynn would be interested in this location but who knows.

The Riviera closing brings back memories when the property was more popular and that leads to nostalgia. Nostalgia is a sentimental longing or wistful affection for the past, typically
for a period or place with happy personal associations. Win or lose (hopefully not to much money) Las Vegas brings back happy memories for lots and lots of people. Some older casinos (similar to dive bars) have a certain charm to them and some people like this.

Music critic Simon Reynolds wrote a very good book called “Retromania: Pop Culture’s Addiction to Its Own Past” and this paragraph was in his book: Nostalgia is now thoroughly entwined within the consumer-entertainment complex: we feel pangs for the products of yesteryear, the novelties and
distractions that filled up our youth. Mass media and pop culture take up an ever-increasing proportion of our mental lives which is why I Love the 70’s/80’s/etc. shows are so effective: the passage of our time has become indexed to the procession of rapidly obsolescing fads, fashions, celebrity careers et al.

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #121 – May 9th, 2015 by chris http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2015/05/vegas-gang-121-may-9th-2015/comment-page-1/#comment-1498 Sun, 10 May 2015 14:07:58 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=340#comment-1498 What a great show I enjoy every one of theme I think resorts world Las Vegas will bring great hopes for Las Vegas with new ideas coming in it will be good growth to Las Vegas

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #120 – April 17th, 2015 by Paul Shanahan http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2015/04/vegas-gang-120-april-17th-2015/comment-page-1/#comment-1490 Sat, 25 Apr 2015 04:44:04 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=337#comment-1490 Sorry I need to edit my last sentence for clarity:
They would need some land on or near the Strip to build the Polercoaster so maybe Caesars Entertainment could put the Polercoaster back near the High Roller.

What Sam Nazarian needs down near SLS is more foot traffic and with the $2.3 billion dollar Las Vegas Global Business District being announced to replace the Riviera this might eventually help. Now assuming the Las Vegas Global Business District is no more than 250 to 300 feet high maybe Carl Icahn would consider removing 200 to 300 feet of the
Fontainebleau so he can try and sell the property that way. At around 500 feet high the Fontainebleau would look much better than at it does now at its current height of around 730 feet.
It would cost Carl Icahn millions of dollars to do this but it would definitely make Fontainebleau more enticing so someone might buy it.

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #120 – April 17th, 2015 by Paul Shanahan http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2015/04/vegas-gang-120-april-17th-2015/comment-page-1/#comment-1489 Fri, 24 Apr 2015 07:10:45 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=337#comment-1489 Instead of the Grand Bazaar Shops in front of Bally’s I think the Polercoaster would have looked great at that location. The Polercoaster is the vertical roller coaster that was originally going to be built at the Tropicana but that never happened. The FAA would have to approve the Polercoaster which would cost around $100 million dollars to build. They would need some land on or near the Strip to build the Polercoaster so maybe Caesars Entertainment could the Polercoaster back near the High Roller.

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #120 – April 17th, 2015 by Robin Aubin http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2015/04/vegas-gang-120-april-17th-2015/comment-page-1/#comment-1488 Sat, 18 Apr 2015 13:55:16 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=337#comment-1488 loved your podcast, as usual. But especially all the bru-ha-ha about the Wynns. My question for you, since my blog covers New England casinos, is do you think the Massachusetts AG and the Mass Gambling Commission are completely unaware of this battle between the Wynns, (I mean, really, how could you be?) thinking they can keep Steve in check, or are they just putting their head in the sand for the money he will be supposedly be bringing to Massachusetts?

Returning to VIMFP this year. I hope to introduce myself. My only regret about your podcast is that it’s only once a month. Always great stuff.

Thanks, guys.
Robin Aubin

]]>
Comment on About by andy colbert http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/about/comment-page-1/#comment-1487 Thu, 16 Apr 2015 02:15:08 +0000 #comment-1487 Have been meaning to comment on this since Jeff Simpson’s death, but never got around to it. This is not meant to diminish Jeff’s contributions to the show, as he did have a passion for what he did and all things Vegas, but the Vegas Gang podcast is much more enjoyable to listen to with only Hunter, Chuck and Dave.
Four people were too many, especially with Jeff dominating the microphone. The current threesome is just perfect.

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #119 – March 6th, 2015 by brindle http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2015/03/vegas-gang-119-march-6th-2015/comment-page-1/#comment-1476 Wed, 18 Mar 2015 15:57:32 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=333#comment-1476 The tax comments above are entirely correct. It is a very ‘unfair’ system where the ‘win’ is counted as income and ‘lose’ is taken as a deduction. Most people do not have enough deductions to exceed the standard deduction and so will not be able to offset the win with their loses.

Also, as I have had happen to me many times under the current system, my income puts me into alternative min tax and I lose these types of deductions. I have paid taxes on payouts even though my yearly win/loss shows clearly that I net lost 2x the amount won. it sucks.

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #119 – March 6th, 2015 by Charles in Richmond http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2015/03/vegas-gang-119-march-6th-2015/comment-page-1/#comment-1473 Sun, 15 Mar 2015 19:01:28 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=333#comment-1473 I heard a congressman/senator suggesting the reduction to $600 reporting level because if you pay someone over $600 (to do work, etc.) you’re suppose to issue them a 1099.

I heard this reporting figure was instituted in the mid 60s. If so, the value of $600 then is worth $4,500 now. Instead of lowering it, they should be raising it.

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #119 – March 6th, 2015 by Paul Shanahan http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2015/03/vegas-gang-119-march-6th-2015/comment-page-1/#comment-1470 Sat, 14 Mar 2015 09:53:32 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=333#comment-1470 After going to google earth and looking at the Riviera from above I could see why the Las Vegas Convention and Visitors Authority bought the Riviera. It is a long and narrow property and I would guess that the Strip fronatge for the Riviera is around 150 to 200 feet. The length of the Riviera from the Strip to Paradise Road might be around 1/2 mile or so. So now the long, narrow $2.3 billion dollar Las Vegas Global Business District will try and bring more huge conventions to Las Vegas.

Unfortunately almost everyone would rather have that piece of $H!T Fountainebleau be removed from the Strip instead of the Riviera but the dice did not roll that way. King Carl probably wants at least $200 million dollars for the Fountainbleau and this might take a long, long time……

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #119 – March 6th, 2015 by detroit1051 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2015/03/vegas-gang-119-march-6th-2015/comment-page-1/#comment-1463 Tue, 10 Mar 2015 11:22:17 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=333#comment-1463 HillBilly’s comment is absolutely right. Higher taxes in ways one doesn’t think about. Even though my losses offset any winnings, my Social Security deductions went up for Medicare because of AGI adjustments. Further, in some states, like my former Michigan, losses may not be deducted from winnings on the state income tax.

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #119 – March 6th, 2015 by HillBilly http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2015/03/vegas-gang-119-march-6th-2015/comment-page-1/#comment-1461 Tue, 10 Mar 2015 02:38:41 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=333#comment-1461 Great show guys! Thanks for all the hard work and love you put into this project.

For the tax thing, there are a couple irritating things about the way w-2G’s affect your returns. The way this is all reported on our returns, all of the winnings get added to your adjusted gross income (AGI) and any losses, up to the amount of winnings, get deducted after the AGI. This has the possibility of causing you to pay more taxes even if you end up loosing since several deductions and credits you may be eligible for get phased out based on your AGI.

So, for example, let’s say in one singe day you hit a $100,000 jackpot, get a cashout, walk over to the baccarat pit and lose all of it. That 100K will be added to your AGI and you will record the loses as a deduction. It is entirely possible that several credits you were otherwise eligible for (student loan deductions for instance) are now phased out due to the jackpot reporting. Without the W-2G and a journal of gaming activity, you can treat that all as a single session and not have to report it above the line.

That is an extreme example but now imagine you play a lot of video poker and you start racking up a lot of w-2G’s even though you aren’t winning. These all hit your AGI and can add up fast.

This move doesn’t have to be about the IRS directly collecting taxes on gambling or preventing money laundering as they can also get paid in a roundabout way by artificially jacking up the AGI of gamblers.

This message is brought to you by Carl’s Jr.

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #119 – March 6th, 2015 by Paul Shanahan http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2015/03/vegas-gang-119-march-6th-2015/comment-page-1/#comment-1460 Sun, 08 Mar 2015 06:08:39 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=333#comment-1460 Great article Dr. Schwartz about the Hard Rock Hotel and Casino. The Hard Rock would have done great on the Strip where New York New York resides. The Hard Rock was packed all the time on the weekends when I lived in Las Vegas in the mid to late 90’s. I would go there when my friends would visit from out of town and the Center Bar was tons of fun. The original Sports Book was real small there and obviously they had no keno.

Peter Morton’s brother Michael owned the Drink nightclub down the street (it also opened in 1995 along with the Hard Rock) on Harmon Avenue and the combination of those two places brought lots and lots of young people to Las Vegas.

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #118 – February 6th, 2015 by JeffinOKC http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2015/02/vegas-gang-118-february-6th-2015/comment-page-1/#comment-1449 Sun, 15 Feb 2015 22:02:18 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=330#comment-1449 My “brother” has been in the Hertz executive bldg since 1982, and he has given me insights about Frissora since he got there.
A little Hertz background: Hertz was the Ford affiliated rent car company (GM was National and Chrysler was Dollar/Thrifty). Car makers would own part or all of the rental company in order to give them a captive outlet for production, which also helped smooth out some economic downturn effects.
By the 2000-2005 period, the car makers had adopted a “Bigger is Better” approach, and the all did silly things like buy “boutique” car makers (GM bought Lotus, Chrysler bought Lamborghini, Ford with Aston-Martin). The head of Ford was Jac Nassar, who had the biggest plans of all: Ford bought Volvo, Land Rover, Jaguar, all of Hertz, AND decided to try and take over the dealer sector by purchasing all brand outlets in a few test cities around the country (Oklahoma City, Salt Lake City and a couple others).
When that all blew up around 2007ish, Hertz was spun back off as a publicly traded rent car company. They were number one in the on-airport segment (primarily business travelers), weak in off-airport (leisure and budget business travelers) and almost no factor in the insurance replacement segment (your car is in the body shop, or other repair shop. Enterprise was 95% of that segment). Enter Mark Frissora.
Frissora had previously at auto parts manufacturer Tenneco, was seen as a smart businessman in a bland business, with a persona well suited for a visible company. Not Steve Wynn, but every bit of The Jim Murren type. Did a few outside boards and associated networking, also.
Hertz was pretty well maxed-out in a mature market, so far as the on-airport segment went, and almost pathologically averse to doing anything that could tarnish their “premium” image. Frissora saw opportunity in the insurance replacement business, but was unsure about the profit potential, because Enterprise is so dominant, and is a closely guarded, privately held company still operated by the founding family. Using the name Hertz Local Edition, or HLE, they became the first competition in the market for a decade. Results are OK.
Hertz decided to go after off-airport and leisure through the Advantage Rent A Car name: figuring their operational genius and existing systems could get the biggest entry into the market with the least expenditure. It proved to be a less rewarding avenue than originally anticipated. During this same time period, Dollar/Thrifty started to send signals that they might be available. Hertz decided this was a faster avenue into the off airport market, and made a play at $45/share. A protracted bidding war ensued and Hertz wound up making the purchase at a little over $80. This is where Frissora’s troubles bega.
Hertz saw anti-trust issues, and determined that selling Advantage would let them make the Dollar/Thrifty deal. They sold Advantage with a vehicle valuation that wound up being twice what the new buyer realized when they went through then normal auction of inventory before buying new cars. Advantage buyer sued Hertz for something like $100 million. Forensic accounting related to the suit showed some issues going all the way back to the Ford ownership days. Because Hertz had begun the massive task of changing their entire accounting system about the same time as the Dollar/Thrifty chase, many accurate records will be extremely time consuming and difficult to find. Some look like they can never be computed with total accuracy. With the stock price languishing, suspension of earnings reporting for the most recent year, the task of restating 2 or 3 years prior, and the Dollar/Thrifty acquisition not providing a financial benefit, it was decided new leadership was desired.
Ironically, the plan Mr. Frissora had negotiated with the state of Florida to move the Hertz headquarters to within a few miles of his home in Boca Raton is too far along to be changed.
interesting tidbit: Mr. Frissora’s daughter is married to the son of former New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg.

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #117 – December 29th, 2014 by motoman http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2014/12/vegas-gang-117/comment-page-1/#comment-1435 Mon, 05 Jan 2015 07:55:33 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=325#comment-1435 The Theme Music is Back! Yay!

To agree with detroit1051, Chuck has really kept us up on the Caesars shenanigans. Music, web design, corrupt capitalism…. Chuck is a true Renaissance man. Reminiscent of the late Don Crabb.

The eb-5 thing is just weird to me. Rich foreigners of who knows what character buying their way into the country, while necessary and hard working folks die in the desert just trying to get here. We once thought condos were a valid way to finance these megaprojects. Or at least, certain “mathematical genius” types thought so. I just heard low-down mortgages for first-time homebuyers are back now. Lessons unlearned.

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #117 – December 29th, 2014 by Robin Aubin http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2014/12/vegas-gang-117/comment-page-1/#comment-1425 Sat, 03 Jan 2015 18:59:54 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=325#comment-1425 Great podcast, and what a bargain – a December two for one.

While 2015 will be a transition year, the thought of Élan across the street from Wynn, Resorts World, etc gets me very excited for the future. A time machine to 2017 would be great.

I have two questions:
I heard of major renovations at Red Rock – any idea what that consists of?

Also, I’d live to hear your thoughts on the continuing of the casino mess in Massachusetts – Specifically
1) is the $500 hand pay law still in effect?
2) why isn’t Mohegan Sun given any respect in terms of expansion?
3) is the experiment of bankroll limits in the new Mass casinos going to work against them?
4) your thoughts on the law that kept in Massachusetts concerning no ATMs on the casino floor – some are insisting no ATMS not in casinos at all.

Thanks guys, can’t wait for January’s podcast. Welcome back Chuck. I hope to plan better to make next year’s VIMFP – never to early to plan.

Binbin (Robin Aubin )
NETime Gambling

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #117 – December 29th, 2014 by Paul Shanahan http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2014/12/vegas-gang-117/comment-page-1/#comment-1419 Fri, 02 Jan 2015 07:01:16 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=325#comment-1419 The EB-5 Visa program has really helped finance some of these casinos currently being built and already opened in Las Vegas (the minimum investment is $500,000 dollars) and considering that China’s poplulation in 2013 was 1.357 billion people this program is going to last a long, long time. But the United States government has a cap on the number of EB-5 Visas per year which is 10,000.

If these casinos are profitable sometime in the near future do these EB-5 Visa investors get some of their money returned to them?

Great show guys. Happy New Year.

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #117 – December 29th, 2014 by detroit1051 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2014/12/vegas-gang-117/comment-page-1/#comment-1418 Thu, 01 Jan 2015 14:11:44 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=325#comment-1418 What a great episode to end 2014. I long ago gave up trying to understand what was going on with Caesars shell game, but you three helped me understand it a little better. @chuckmonster has really done his homework on Caesars.

I agree 2015 will be a transition year for Vegas, but I really hope we see construction get well underway on Resorts World, and we get something definitive on the New Frontier site.

Enjoyed Dr. Dave’s analogy of Sam’s restricted license to Dave’s approach to students. Whatever happens, Sam is responsible.

Finally, Chuck’s sure bet, “What stays in Vegas” sounds fascinating. The author, Adam Tanner, has an interesting background:
http://www.amazon.com/Adam-Tanner/e/B00MSXWOKQ/ref=dp_byline_cont_book_1

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #117 – December 29th, 2014 by worldpool http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2014/12/vegas-gang-117/comment-page-1/#comment-1417 Wed, 31 Dec 2014 01:04:34 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=325#comment-1417 Its been a great 2014 for las Vegas a lot has happen this year with SLS The LING upcoming Park and the cosmopolitan changes but for me 2015 should be a year when changes dose happen in Las Vegas and I always enjoy our show

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #116 – December 18th, 2014 by rob@skyyontherocks http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2014/12/vegas-gang-116-december-18th-2014/comment-page-1/#comment-1416 Sun, 28 Dec 2014 16:36:52 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=321#comment-1416 This was a very beneficial listen if only to give us an education on the subject before we make a decision on which product to use. The problem is we don’t have a choice to make. The cab authorities will make sure we don’t have a choice and they will do it by telling us it is for our own good and safety; a sure tip-off that money is at stake here.
Even if Uber is nothing more than organized fee-based hitchhiking in which you use an app instead of a thumb, the market wants an alternative. That is the root of the comments above and that is what scares the current establishment. Cab rates/fees in LV are already some of the most expensive in the country. And, while there are some pro’s out there driving cabs in LV, the overall service and trust component has diminished over the years creating a space for something better.
In my idealistic world, Uber would force the LV cab companies and authorities to look underneath their own hoods as a result of popular opinion being against them. We don’t really need another side to the story. What we need is for cab drivers in LV to know where the Silverton is, know the difference between the rush tower entrance at the Golden Nugget from the regular entrance , and have zero tolerance for long-hauling. Easing up the fares on tourists which are already inflated due to the circuitous routes cabs need to take just to exit a property would help also. And yes, not having to wait 1/2 hour for a cab at the Peppermill or even longer at an off strip bar would also be appreciated. If you do those things you would not have to worry about Uber.
As consumers, we need to ensure that when we get an honest ride, and the driver is one of those types that actually enhances your tourist experience, not only tip them, but say thank you with a smile like you would to a dealer or a bartender.
Competition is really a good thing for the consumer. While it sounds like Uber has hit a nerve, what is really broken is the relationship between the cab drivers, the cab authorities, and the customer.

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #116 – December 18th, 2014 by Michael James http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2014/12/vegas-gang-116-december-18th-2014/comment-page-1/#comment-1413 Tue, 23 Dec 2014 19:29:10 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=321#comment-1413 I’m going with the majority on this. Good subject, not so good on the execution. Sounded like I was at a union meeting.

And the worst part, in my opinion, is that he just rambled and rambled on about stuff that is not part of a consumer’s choice… their insurance plans, etc. If there are insurance concerns, it should be between the Uber drivers and the company; if the driver doesn’t like the choices, he has the option to not be an independent contractor. That, as a consumer, has nothing to do with whether I choose a cab or Uber.

(Here’s where I disclaim that I have never used Uber, and shy away from Las Vegas cabs because I can’t understand a $30 cab ride downtown when I can get a rental for $30 a day).

I also took great offense when your cabbie told us that the buyer should beware regarding long hauling and should know where s/he wants to go. That was quite a BS statement for him. Like it or not, taxis are part of a public trust… I am a tourist in your town that needs to get to Point B. The trust is that you know where you’re going. The bad reputation that cab companies carry with them is largely earned. I often use the phrase “perception is reality”. If there was no long-hauling, if some cabs didn’t smell bad, if some cabbies didn’t smell bad, if taking a cab was a more pleasant experience, there would be no bad reputation.

I made it through about half the podcast, to about the point where the preacher was talking about some insurance company that had only been around for ten years – Ten years, can you believe it? – and didn’t bother with the rest.

I don’t personally care that there wasn’t an opposing viewpoint, but this was just a union rally and if this podcast were a talk radio show, the caller should have been cut off after the first side road in which he diverged.

Overall, though, I love the podcast and wish you’d increase to every third week. Thank you.

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #116 – December 18th, 2014 by detroit1051 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2014/12/vegas-gang-116-december-18th-2014/comment-page-1/#comment-1412 Mon, 22 Dec 2014 17:23:36 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=321#comment-1412 Uber is a valid topic today, but the episode was 60 minutes of a one-sided monologue. It would have been much more credible had there been someone speaking for Uber.

Having said that, I don’t like the way Uber tries to bully its way into markets without regard for regulations. While listening to the podcast, I was also searching for some more information on insurance coverage. This Forbes article was informative: http://www.forbes.com/sites/ellenhuet/2014/12/18/uber-lyft-driver-insurance/

For the time being, I will still use cabs.

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #116 – December 18th, 2014 by Bob W http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2014/12/vegas-gang-116-december-18th-2014/comment-page-1/#comment-1410 Sun, 21 Dec 2014 17:39:56 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=321#comment-1410 After leaving my comment I recalled something else. The driver you interviewed when asked about long hauling said “Buyer beware.” But why should we have to be wary. We indirectly pay for the regulations. I travel to Vegas often for business and pleasure. Last summer I took my sons for a stay downtown. On the way out a cab driver took us for a $42 ride to the airport. I was busy answering emails on my phone when I looked up and saw what he was doing. He made an excuse that there was a convention blocking traffic. Pure BS. Filed a complaint to the TA. Had the cab company name, drivers name, and times. They did nothing because they wanted the cab number. My father drove cabs. I am sympathetic to the driver you interviewed. But there is something very wrong with vegas cabs. They are not customer centric.

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #116 – December 18th, 2014 by Bob W http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2014/12/vegas-gang-116-december-18th-2014/comment-page-1/#comment-1409 Sun, 21 Dec 2014 16:18:41 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=321#comment-1409 I thought the podcast needed a pro uber person in there. The main economic point of ride sharing is that people’s cars spend 90% of there time parked so if there owners could spend time driving people it make use of an otherwise idle capital asset. If his beef is customer safety then force the individuals to be vetted like cab drivers. I think the cab driver you interviewed doesn’t want the competition.

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #116 – December 18th, 2014 by Bill P. http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2014/12/vegas-gang-116-december-18th-2014/comment-page-1/#comment-1408 Sun, 21 Dec 2014 06:43:19 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=321#comment-1408 Hunter, I think you tried to do the right thing early and get the guest to talk about what cabs could do better. But like a typical politician, all he could do was deflect and make it about his adversary. Uber exists because they do certain things better than cabs. Everyone who uses Uber does so because in some way, they find utility in some part of Uber’s service the cabs aren’t providing. The semantics around how these services are classified doesn’t change that fact.

Making an argument that I (as a consumer) am not smart enough to determine my own personal risk tolerance when choosing whose car I get into….doesn’t resonate with me. I don’t need another parent. If I want all of the “assurances” that come with a regulated cab, then I’ll choose that.

Love the podcast. But I might suggest not doing an episode like this without being able to secure opinions on both sides of the issue.

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #115 – November 20th, 2014 by bob http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2014/11/vegas-gang-115-november-20th-2014/comment-page-1/#comment-1402 Mon, 01 Dec 2014 13:00:44 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=318#comment-1402 I think gaming in Springfiled will do well.

According to Wikipedia the Hartford metropolitan area has a population of 1.2 million and the Springfield area 700,000.

Also, while places like Worcester and New Haven might be closer to other casinos it might be easier to drive to Springfield. I would guess that it will not be easy to get into the new Boston casino and the parking will be a pain in the ass.

I read the St. Louis casinos do about 1.1 billion in a metro population 2.8 million. As long as the Springfield casino does above about 400 million it should be fine.

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #115 – November 20th, 2014 by Paul Shanahan http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2014/11/vegas-gang-115-november-20th-2014/comment-page-1/#comment-1395 Wed, 26 Nov 2014 08:36:04 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=318#comment-1395 Great show guys, welcome back Chuck. The New Yorker article about to many casinos in the northeastern part of the United States makes a lot of sense. The I-95 corridor from Boston to Washington DC has lots of casinos now and more in the near future. I would assume the population is around 55 to 60 million people in that general area so there are plenty of casinos already but the states want tax revenue so they build more. I live in Chicago and Illinois and all the states around Illinois have casinos so this market is also saturated.

Chuck thanks for the explanation of Caesars Entertainment shell game. They are over $20 billion dollars in debt and have been deep in debt for at least 4 years or longer. Now on to the REIT to waste more time. Mr. Loveman has just called Felix the Cat
to see what is in his Magic Bag of Tricks.

Maybe Caesars Entertainment should sell a casino in Las Vegas to pay off some creditors. The Rio is an obvious choice but this could have happened years ago and for some reason Caesars Entertainmenet still has it. Planet Hollywood and Harrahs are on the ends of their land bank of casinos on the Strip (thanks Dr. Schwartz) so then maybe one of them gets put on the auction block. This was probably part of the reason why Phil Ruffin was able to purchase Traesure Island from MGM Resorts International.

Planet Hollywood is newer so Caesars Entertainment could keep that and sell Harrahs. These creditors and debt holders are going to want some money soon so they better start making some suggestions to Mr. Loveman before he leaves for Brigadoon.

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #115 – November 20th, 2014 by MattK http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2014/11/vegas-gang-115-november-20th-2014/comment-page-1/#comment-1394 Wed, 26 Nov 2014 01:42:32 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=318#comment-1394 You guys mentioned MGM Springfield as an example of the kind of big resort that’s getting tougher and tougher to stay viable in today’s economy. For a while now I’ve been looking at the map of Massachusetts and surrounding states, wondering who’s going to be driving to this place and keeping the 125,000 sf of gaming space busy.

As best as I can tell, Hartford CT is the only metro area that will have Springfield MA as its closest gaming destination. (about 30 minutes drive to Springfield vs 1 hour to Foxwoods). Worcester MA will have a slightly shorter drive to Boston. Everywhere else of significance (and I’m including places like Worcester as significant) has a shorter drive to a different casino.

Springfield locals? How many are there? I just went to Zillow to see where the wealthy neighborhoods are. Springfield doesn’t have any. I used to drive through there in the mid 90s. Main street was a ghost town, and there were billboards, even back then, saying things like “Casino coming soon!”. Springfield has been a candidate town for a casino for a long time – back when there was no regional competition and Atlantic City was your only alternative.

I guess what I’m saying is, who the hell is going to keep this place open?

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #115 – November 20th, 2014 by bob http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2014/11/vegas-gang-115-november-20th-2014/comment-page-1/#comment-1393 Tue, 25 Nov 2014 15:19:45 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=318#comment-1393 The reason that Woolworth’s may now be a sporting goods store in Santa Barbara is that the company is now Foot Locker. They opened shoe stores as they were closing Woolworth’s.

Which leads to questions about Circus Circus. Their days may be numbered. MGM breaks out the EBITDA of their casinos. By this metric Circus Circus is easily the least profitable of their Las Vegas properties. EBITDA was 16 million in 2013. The Luxor was second from the bottom at 61 million. Out of that 16 million they have to pay for capital expenditures at Circus Circus so the cash run of MGM has got to be close to zero.

In Cesar’s third quarter conference call Loveman said that management closed Tunica Harrah’s even though it had positive cash flow. Loveman deemed it a success because cash flow had increased by more at Tunica Horseshoe than Cesar’s than gave up at Harrah’s.

So Cesar’s went ahead and closed the Showboat, which in 2013 had EBITDA of 45 million. In the conference call Loveman said that the other Cesar’s properties in Atlantic City would retain at least half the business of the Showboat and that would allow total company profits to increase.

Using that logic, MGM could easily decide that they can push enough of the Circus Circus business into other properties and make more money off a smaller footprint. If you are running a hotel 80% full and you can increase your occupancy by 10% those extra room nights are almost total profit. Variable costs are relatively low.

As for the legacy of Gary Loveman the man believes that because he has a degree from MIT he is a genius. He has no self awareness. I know this because I have seen pictures of his latest hairpiece.

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #115 – November 20th, 2014 by Hunter http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2014/11/vegas-gang-115-november-20th-2014/comment-page-1/#comment-1392 Sun, 23 Nov 2014 03:28:29 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=318#comment-1392 Absolutely. Long time ago…

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #115 – November 20th, 2014 by detroit1051 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2014/11/vegas-gang-115-november-20th-2014/comment-page-1/#comment-1391 Sun, 23 Nov 2014 03:00:54 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=318#comment-1391 I can’t believe Hunter is old enough to have sat at Woolworth’s lunch counter with his mom.

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #114 – October 18th, 2014 @ VIMFP 2014 by bob http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2014/10/vegas-gang-114-october-18th-2014-vimfp-2014/comment-page-1/#comment-1183 Fri, 24 Oct 2014 09:51:54 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=314#comment-1183 Good show, thanks for the work.

I have a question about Atlantic City. I have been three times. The first time was in 1987 when I was young and dumb. I walked back from one of the Trump properties down Pacific Avenue at about 1:00 A.M. on a Saturday morning to wherever I had parked. As I walked past the abandoned storefronts I watched a couple of guys launch a wino through the window of one of the edifices.

But when I went back in 2002 and 2014 I was stunned how much had been knocked down. The city has lots of empty lots. In August I drove around a fair amount and found the neighborhoods downscale but not terrifying.

When critics of Atlantic City say the government did not fix it up how much are they saying that that more effort should have been given to ejecting these largely non-Angelo residents from their homes and replacing them with a bunch of condos full of upper income whites that the tourists would feel more comfortable associating with.

In other words the city did display sufficient energy in getting rid of the residents of said locale?

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #114 – October 18th, 2014 @ VIMFP 2014 by Paul Shanahan http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2014/10/vegas-gang-114-october-18th-2014-vimfp-2014/comment-page-1/#comment-1181 Fri, 24 Oct 2014 04:35:10 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=314#comment-1181 I thought by now Resorts World Las Vegas would be farther along in construction but I am still hoping that they open by the end of 2016. Another possible new development in the North Strip area could be where the Clarion Hotel and Casino is on Convention Center Drive. Lorenzo Doumani just bought the Clarion for $22.5 million dollars and is imploding it in a couple of months and trying to build a new mixed-use property there but unfortunately this does not include gambling. Anyway the more development down there the better and maybe sometime soon Carl Icahn will sell the Fontainebleau and that eyesore can be imploded and removed from the North Strip.

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #114 – October 18th, 2014 @ VIMFP 2014 by Jake http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2014/10/vegas-gang-114-october-18th-2014-vimfp-2014/comment-page-1/#comment-1179 Wed, 22 Oct 2014 19:51:45 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=314#comment-1179 All criticisms hereby revoked, in reverent honor of Chuck’s use of the phrase “moist and musty blueprint of your cantilevered balls.”

Can’t wait to hear from Steelman on a future episode.

My apologies for acting like an ass. Hope you all can get some sleep!

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #114 – October 18th, 2014 @ VIMFP 2014 by gradytripp http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2014/10/vegas-gang-114-october-18th-2014-vimfp-2014/comment-page-1/#comment-1177 Wed, 22 Oct 2014 01:55:56 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=314#comment-1177 I’ve been listening for a few years, to you guys and FHBM. Never been to VIMFP. First time commenting here.

I thought this was a really strong show. Given all the talk about how boozy and crazy VIMFP is, I was expecting something much more loosey goosey. Instead, it was a really tight 45 minute “state of the gaming world” discussion–as Detroit1051 says, Roger and Dave worked really well together and offered concise yet very thoughtful takes on all the various jurisdictions you covered. And I thought you did a really good job guiding the discussion, Hunter.

Not that I don’t enjoy the “regular” VG episodes, but I’m assuming that you were operating under fairly tight time limitations here, and I think it really brought out the best in your team. Speaking only for myself, I tend to tune out a bit more during the intro and conclusion segments of the regular episodes (announcements and sure bets), because I think the analysis and conversation that makes up the middle of the show is so strong.

Anyway, well done, and thanks for posting the episode so quickly. Get some rest, and with luck I’ll be making it to VIMFP one of these years.

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #114 – October 18th, 2014 @ VIMFP 2014 by chuckmonster http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2014/10/vegas-gang-114-october-18th-2014-vimfp-2014/comment-page-1/#comment-1176 Tue, 21 Oct 2014 23:01:29 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=314#comment-1176 I accept all criticism regarding not sitting on the panel at VIMFP. It was my decision and it was made roughly around the time I went on total hiatus. Perhaps I/we should’ve been more clear in advance that I was on hiatus for VIMFP as well, although the schedule did say something to the effect of “Hunter and Dr. Dave will be joined by….”

NOBODY is more upset about Steelman bailing on us than we are. You can bet a moist and musty blueprint of your cantilevered balls that this is the truth. It seems that nearly EVERY year our big celebrity guest pulls the last minute “something came up” card on us. exceptions being – George Maloof (VPP1), Tom McCartney (VPP2) and Derek Stevens (VIMFP Ballys, VIMFP D.1). MGM PR god Alan Feldman (VPP2) bailed and sent an underling, Caesars stymied our attempts to get anybody from their mgmt to talk to us (VIMFP PHo) , Seth Schorr bailed and sent an underling to (VIMFP D.1) and now Paul Steelman bails on days before (VIMFP D.2).

After working for a whole goddamn year to build a great event, we’re always forced to scramble at the last possible minute causing us (primarily Hunter) to rewrite and reimagine a show from scratch that has been advertised for months. Fortunately Roger Gros stepped up at the last minute and was just as great as he was on the previous Vegas Gang episode he partook in.

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #114 – October 18th, 2014 @ VIMFP 2014 by Hunter http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2014/10/vegas-gang-114-october-18th-2014-vimfp-2014/comment-page-1/#comment-1175 Tue, 21 Oct 2014 22:34:04 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=314#comment-1175 Criticism is fine (which is why I didn’t just delete your post).

Steelman canceled because he had a pressing business issue out of the country. He was apologetic and has promised to do the regular show, which we plan to take him up on.

As for Chuck and why he chose not to participate, you’d have to ask him.

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #114 – October 18th, 2014 @ VIMFP 2014 by Jake http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2014/10/vegas-gang-114-october-18th-2014-vimfp-2014/comment-page-1/#comment-1174 Tue, 21 Oct 2014 17:27:12 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=314#comment-1174 No offense meant, just an honest take. But I’ll keep the criticisms to myself in the future. Though I wasn’t there at VIMFP, I know it must be a pain in the ass to plan and execute, and I didn’t at all mean to impugn any of you.

Was more an expression of frustration with Steelman, quite frankly. It’s not nice to commit to something and then bail, relatively last-minute. So as I said above, hope he had a good excuse.

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #114 – October 18th, 2014 @ VIMFP 2014 by admin http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2014/10/vegas-gang-114-october-18th-2014-vimfp-2014/comment-page-1/#comment-1172 Tue, 21 Oct 2014 05:10:01 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=314#comment-1172 After working my ass off for months followed by a weekend of just pure working insanity, it’s comments like the above that make it all worth while.

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #114 – October 18th, 2014 @ VIMFP 2014 by Jake http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2014/10/vegas-gang-114-october-18th-2014-vimfp-2014/comment-page-1/#comment-1171 Mon, 20 Oct 2014 13:01:30 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=314#comment-1171 Disappointed in this show — as an architect, I was really looking forward to hearing from Paul Steelman. Not sure why Steelman had to bail, but hope he had a reasonable excuse. Nice job getting Gros in at the last minute.

Was also disappointed that Chuck couldn’t join in. Obviously he was there at VIMFP, and so even if he’s still officially “on hiatus,” would have been nice if he could have joined, even as a one-time thing.

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #114 – October 18th, 2014 @ VIMFP 2014 by detroit1051 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2014/10/vegas-gang-114-october-18th-2014-vimfp-2014/comment-page-1/#comment-1170 Mon, 20 Oct 2014 01:01:42 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=314#comment-1170 Great podcast. Dave and Roger work well together, and Hunter brouht out thee best in each of them. I wish it had been longer to permit some discussion on Cosmo, Delano and Cromwell. I’ve read some less than enthusiastic reports on Delano, more favorable about Cromwell, but Cosmo’s initial vibe seems to have died down. Where will they be positioned a year from now, and will SLS have found itself in that same time?

I didn’t know whether to laugh or cry when Roger said he met Steve and Sheldon in the Green Room, and they “were old men”. Yikes! Age is in the eye of the beholder 🙂

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #113 – September 18th, 2014 by detroit1051 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2014/09/vegas-gang-113-september-18th-2014/comment-page-1/#comment-1163 Sun, 21 Sep 2014 12:54:12 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=311#comment-1163 Steve has already given a few hints on changes to the Everett hotel exterior:
http://www.bostonglobe.com/metro/2014/09/20/wynn/DEQGK883ISMtLTSIt3VGGI/story.html

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #113 – September 18th, 2014 by Kathryn http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2014/09/vegas-gang-113-september-18th-2014/comment-page-1/#comment-1162 Sun, 21 Sep 2014 09:30:30 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=311#comment-1162 I want to second Arizona Al’s comments. John was great on the podcast. I really like the energy that having a rotating smorgasbord of guest co-host brings to the podcast. I guess it probably also takes some of the pressure off the other hosts to prepare content. If Chuck ever returns from his road trip through the Gobi desert, keeping the ‘guest co-host’ idea going might be cool.

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #113 – September 18th, 2014 by Detroit1051 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2014/09/vegas-gang-113-september-18th-2014/comment-page-1/#comment-1160 Sat, 20 Sep 2014 22:39:32 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=311#comment-1160 Great show. John A hall is wise beyond his years. First time I have listened with a checklist watching for cupcake and sugar comments.
I believe that Steve Wynn will merely tweet his Boston, Everett, property. He will probably reduce the vertical thrust and make it more horizontal, but I don’t expect any major changes.
I haven’t heard the memorial trashcan story before, but Bartolotta is the only restaurant I have been disappointed In at Wynn Las Vegas.

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #113 – September 18th, 2014 by Arizona Al http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2014/09/vegas-gang-113-september-18th-2014/comment-page-1/#comment-1158 Fri, 19 Sep 2014 15:14:14 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=311#comment-1158 Long time listener to the podcast. Love the show. Like everyone, I miss Jeff (especially his reviews of the parking situations at the Strip properties – makes me smile). I am so glad that you all did the special podcasts to highlight the lifetimes and careers of the podcast hosts. Those shows really added so much in your listeners’ understanding of what lights your fire about Las Vegas. I am thankful that I got to hear Jeff’s story back then.

Now, I miss Chuck. Especially, his commentary on all things related to casino design. It is always very insightful.

But I have to say that listening to John A. Hall’s review of his recent stay at SLS was great. I walked through the property the week after they opened (it was during the early afternoon) and it was pretty quiet as I would expect. I missed checking it out at night time, so I didn’t get a great sense of the property’s energy. Loved hearing John’s comments and might head back to check it out in more detail the next time that we are in town.

John obviously did a lot of prep in advance of the podcast and I enjoyed listening. I have read John’s reviews on Vegas Tripping in the past – and while he is an excellent writer, he is also great as a podcast guest host. I would love to hear more.

Hunter and Dave – you guys are the best. John – you are right there with them!

Here’s hoping that Chuck is enjoying his well deserved time away…

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #112 – August 15th, 2014 by Paul Shanahan http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2014/08/vegas-gang-112-august-15th-2014/comment-page-1/#comment-1014 Wed, 20 Aug 2014 04:45:23 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=308#comment-1014 I think most people who listen to this show and read Chuck’s phenomenal Vegas Tripping blog (including me) did not think SLS would reopen primarily because of the location. Sam Nazarian came through with the cash and here comes SLS.

I used to sell printing to the Sahara Hotel and Casino in the mid 90’s and I would wander through the property going to the different departments and it looked old and rundown then. Now Sam and his team at SLS will open this weekend and let’s see how they do.

Thanks to all you guys for putting together this show. I was reading a newspaper article recently and they were talking to a photographer who was extremely successful and has taken pictures of Lou Reed and a lot of other famous musicians. He was in his mid 40’s and he said when he was growing up in the late 70’s he would sit around and have nothing to do so he started taking photographs of different things. Eventually this led to his life long passion which is being a successful photographer. In the excellent book “Retromaia” by Simon Reynolds he said something similar in that in the early 1980’s he would patiently wait for a music magazine to come out once a week because he was also bored most of the time and had nothing to do.

Now it is the opposite. Not enough time and to many things to do which makes it more impressive on how good this Vegas Gang podcast has done over the years.

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #112 – August 15th, 2014 by Jeff in OKC http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2014/08/vegas-gang-112-august-15th-2014/comment-page-1/#comment-1012 Wed, 20 Aug 2014 01:39:08 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=308#comment-1012 Forgot to mention the other day that this was another great episode, and I want to thank you guys for taking the time to do it whenever you can. (And no, I am not going to rip you a new asshole in the next few paragraphs)

I don’t think it is unfair to say that Hunter and Chuck have been generally negative in their opinion of Nazarian’s chances in getting SLS Las Vegas open. And I think there is still a skeptical approach to whatever news comes from the project. I think the concerns about the location and getting people to go there are overemphasized. It is still on every description of “The Las Vegas Strip”. It is on one of the most famous streets in the world. A street that Australian billionaire James Packer described as something akin to the mother road of the gaming industry. It has countless cars and buses driving by, a monorail stop, an Interstate 3 blocks away. And I never hear anyone say that the Stratosphere (which is 3-4 blocks North and not on the traditional description of “The Strip”) is at risk because of it’s location. Maybe because it has been operating successfully enough for over 15 years? Seems to me that Caesars spent more than the SLS cost to build an “Observation Wheel”, a Polaroid Store and some other shops & bars. And MGM spent more to build an arena, Shake Shack and other dining/retail.

I think that Nazarian is willing to have a small ownership percentage in Las Vegas in order to maximize his “brand”. I would guess that his true ownership in many other SLS related operations may not be much different. Much as Holiday Inn was mainly a hotel/motel franchisor for decades (taking only a small percentage of the overall revenue) before Phil Satre guided it into becoming Harrah’s/Caesars, and Wal-Mart didn’t own their real estate because they didn’t have the financial ability to fund their explosive growth if it included fixed assets, SLS appears to have chosen to give up ownership for growth. It has worked for many and failed for many. Time will tell.

But, I like what I have seen of the SLS transformation I have seen so far. I think it is stuff that looks more valuable than it really is, and I want to buy in. That is what makes dreamers into visionaries IMO.

Love you guys. No BS. Pure love and appreciation.

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #112 – August 15th, 2014 by bob http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2014/08/vegas-gang-112-august-15th-2014/comment-page-1/#comment-1011 Tue, 19 Aug 2014 14:52:48 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=308#comment-1011 To tweak an old joke financial analysts exist to make the the astrologers look intellectually credible.

Having said that the New Jersey gaming commission requires casinos to report profits and losses quarterly. Resorts and the the Taj are burning through a lot of cash.

If Resorts can not start producing positive cash flow from customers they pick up from the closed casinos by next summer I think it closes. The Mohegan Sun tribe owns Resorts and given the declines in the Connecticut market I wonder how long they will carry this property. The same applies for for the Taj.

Also, I find the back patting that occurs in Las Vegas over the state of the entertainment industry in that city delusional. The casinos in Nevada have losses of over a billion dollars a year. Industries that lose money eventually shrink.

Long post but I tried to reserve a room at the SLS for a week from October 4 until October 11. It costs $107 a night on average. The D cost about $65 a night on average because because weekday rooms were $34-$39. I do not see how SLS can compete with that midweek pricing given their location.

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #112 – August 15th, 2014 by Toastcmu http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2014/08/vegas-gang-112-august-15th-2014/comment-page-1/#comment-1009 Mon, 18 Aug 2014 16:44:32 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=308#comment-1009 Jeff – I think given NJ and their gaming commission would have problems with Nazarian. – remember this is the same state that wanted MGM to divest its interest in Borgata due to its connections with Pansy Ho. Of course they were never able to divest so now they are still active with Boyd there. That’s my observation I’m sure Dr Dave can comment if I’m off base.

I really want AC to succeed but they really need to reevaluate their model. Charging 50 for casino parking when there’s a beach concert turns off future customers I’m sure. Not to mention I heard that the crowd may have been photoshopped to look bigger, but that’s a separate issue.

Cheers to all
-B

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #112 – August 15th, 2014 by detroit1051 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2014/08/vegas-gang-112-august-15th-2014/comment-page-1/#comment-1008 Mon, 18 Aug 2014 00:47:20 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=308#comment-1008 Dr. Dave didn’t think the smaller rooms will be too much a deterrent. Other friend thinks it will be. We’ll see.

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #112 – August 15th, 2014 by detroit1051 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2014/08/vegas-gang-112-august-15th-2014/comment-page-1/#comment-1007 Mon, 18 Aug 2014 00:36:25 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=308#comment-1007 Haven’t been to AC since ’09, but I really liked the Harrah’s/Borgata area. Boardwalk didn’t do that much for me. I can fly FLL-ACY in 2.5 hours, much easier than going to Vegas, but I’d rather go to Vegas.

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #112 – August 15th, 2014 by Hunter http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2014/08/vegas-gang-112-august-15th-2014/comment-page-1/#comment-1006 Mon, 18 Aug 2014 00:35:28 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=308#comment-1006 Personally, I’d like to see if he can vitalize the North Strip (or at least 10% vitalize it) before I start sending him off to save other places. 🙂

That said, in my mind the transportation problem is a pretty huge one. Atlantic City’s airport is too small which means most people have to either drive (north easterners) or fly+drive from Philadelphia. It’s a drag.

I also think there’s a real question about the industry, in conjunction with the local government’s willingness to really do what is required to make big changes. As we talked about two episodes ago, they don’t allow beach party type venues… I understand those kinds of things have downsides but if they’re not willing to really think differently, they’re in trouble.

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #112 – August 15th, 2014 by JeffinOKC http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2014/08/vegas-gang-112-august-15th-2014/comment-page-1/#comment-1005 Sun, 17 Aug 2014 23:10:35 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=308#comment-1005 I’ve never been to Atlantic City, so if this is a laughable idea I am not offended. I was wondering if:
Could Sam Nazarian be the savior of Atlantic City?
Assuming SLS is a big success, and their business model of providing frugal luxury with a low reliance on gaming, and higher profit margins through the use of in house owned and developed entertainment and F&B offerings is a real game changer when they get to the net-net takeaway. Is AC able to be positioned as a provider of wider ranged tourism experiences than their current dependence on gaming has displayed? Are there challenges with the geography, political climate, infrastructure or regional perception that are insurmountable, or very difficult? It appears to me that there are perfectly good buildings already there and they just need to be repurposed.

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #111 – July 17th, 2014 by brandon http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2014/07/vegas-gang-111-july-17th-2014/comment-page-1/#comment-995 Tue, 29 Jul 2014 13:54:18 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=305#comment-995 Chuck nailed Atlantic City – the boardwalk & beach should be “The Strip” or “Fremont Street” but it’s a closed off mix of t-shirt shops during the day and wandering zone for bums in the evening with no police presence. Expanding the beach bars and making the boardwalk a heavily policed 24 hour open container zone would make you *want* to leave the casino and drift from place to place. As it is now, you walk outside during the day and there’s not a bar or casino for a few football fields either way. At night, it’s desolate and intimidating.

This would also allow it to compete with other NJ boardwalks and beach towns. None have open container zones or beach bars, so folks tend to head to towns like Belmar and Seaside where there are larger clubs and you can rent a house cheaply for the summer.

Vegas learned long ago to market to 20-somethings with disposable income – Atlantic City (and the state) need to figure it out.

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #111 – July 17th, 2014 by Hunter http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2014/07/vegas-gang-111-july-17th-2014/comment-page-1/#comment-992 Sun, 20 Jul 2014 16:37:33 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=305#comment-992 I have a little insight into #1. Basically, they fucked up. The name that they picked from their list (The Quad) didn’t land the way they wanted. Naming the whole place The Linq from the start was on the table but the original thinking was keeping them separate was somehow a branding win. This was not a universally held opinion internally but it’s what won out… until now.

#2 is a lot harder because there’s so much context missing so it’s unclear what the options truly are. Ideally you’d just skip The Quad entirely and not re-name anything until you could re-open with a totally transformed experience (i.e. rooms too). I don’t love ‘The Linq’ as a name but having it all be one thing makes sense. As you said, the licensing agreement around the IP stuff is not clear so I can’t say how plausible that this would have been. I assume it could have been fixe with $$ but who knows how much, etc…

… but the grand plan was not to brand the place with a bridge identity.

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #111 – July 17th, 2014 by Jeff in OKC http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2014/07/vegas-gang-111-july-17th-2014/comment-page-1/#comment-991 Sun, 20 Jul 2014 00:18:04 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=305#comment-991 OK, then. Well, in that case, please humor me and allow me to ask a couple questions.
1. What do you think happened then?
2. WWHHD (What Would Hunter Have Done)?
Or, possibly, if the wonderful panel would indulge me further
WWTVGHD?
Love the show, guys. Love what you stand for.

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #111 – July 17th, 2014 by Hunter http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2014/07/vegas-gang-111-july-17th-2014/comment-page-1/#comment-990 Sat, 19 Jul 2014 17:35:26 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=305#comment-990 The name The Quad was not intended to be a placeholder. Speculation on that point not required.

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #111 – July 17th, 2014 by Jeff in OKC http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2014/07/vegas-gang-111-july-17th-2014/comment-page-1/#comment-989 Sat, 19 Jul 2014 16:57:05 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=305#comment-989 I don’t have any problem believing that the Quad was always meant to be a placeholder, for several reasons: First, the way the Imperial Palace name was dropped by both Caesars and Boyd when their respective name use periods expired makes me think that the (prior owner) Engelstad family did not really want to give up the name. I’m guessing they either wanted too much money for a licensing fee, or wanted to sell the name outright for too much money. It’s possible the Hitler issue was a negative that both of the buyers didn’t want to be associated with over the long term. Clearly there was no agreement regarding the value of the name.

I think Caesars knew there was no way they could finish the Linq project before the name agreement expired, and that the Imperial Palace name was so associated with low price and bargain property that it would be a hindrance to keep it, regardless. But, there was also a long enough period where the hotel and casino would be in such a state of being both run down and renovating that using the “real” name could be permanently damaging to it’s image in the future. I think it’s likely that the entire Quad rebrand cost was lower than the cost of keeping the Imperial Palace name, and/or what Caesars saw as the damage to the long term prospects for the Linq. It is also very possible that Caesars was in such shaky financial shape, and the Las Vegas market was also so soft, that they might have had to sell off either, or both of the projects mid-stream. This would have been the easiest way to handle the separation.

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #111 – July 17th, 2014 by detroit1051 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2014/07/vegas-gang-111-july-17th-2014/comment-page-1/#comment-988 Sat, 19 Jul 2014 15:15:23 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=305#comment-988 Lots of downers in the podcast, but wait until SLS Las Vegas opens next month. It will be as huge to the North Strip as The D Las Vegas is to downtown.

I, for one, enjoyed the discussion of IGT. From a slot design standpoint, IGT was originally one of the creative forces in video reel slots, and their creative guy, Joe Kaminkow, was the best in the industry. Then, IGT lost its way and lost its creative staff. Where is Joe Kaminkow now? He’s the creative force at Aristocrat Technologies which has become a slot powerhouse. Aristocrat, WMS and some smaller names have left IGT in the dust. In my opinion, IGT has become the General Motors of slots. We’ll see what GTECH can do with it.

http://www.businessinsider.com/talent-leaving-igt-2013-2

http://www.casinoenterprisemanagement.com/articles/march-2014/joe-kaminkow-cultivates-slot-game-creativity

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #111 – July 17th, 2014 by Paul Shanahan http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2014/07/vegas-gang-111-july-17th-2014/comment-page-1/#comment-987 Sat, 19 Jul 2014 05:08:47 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=305#comment-987 Having been to the old O’Sheas which was a “dive” casino the main reason it was popular was because drinks were cheap along with low ($10) table minimums. I would assume the new O’Sheas is also relatively inexpensive which is probably why Chuck said it was so crowded. Maybe the High Roller should drop the prices to $20 and include one free drink (beer for adults, pop for children). Then when exiting the High Roller the customers might walk through the Linq towards the Strip and spend some money in the different retail and dining establishemnts in the Linq.

Removing Quad as a casino name for Caesars Entertainment was a good idea because hardly anyone liked that name and Linq sounds much better. When Chuck mentioned getting a good domain name limited the marketing department at Caesars
Entertainment in naming the casino (which is how The Quad came to fruition) I ran into the same problem ten years ago when I tried to find a good domain name for something related to dice.

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #110 – June 5th, 2014 by toastcmu http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2014/06/vegas-gang-110-june-5th-2014/comment-page-1/#comment-979 Sun, 08 Jun 2014 18:07:53 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=302#comment-979 Funny how you guys were mentioning real time data for table games – I know out here parx in Philly actually does something called the “live game report” – http://www.parxcasino.com/gamereport

I’m not sure how successful it is in their eyes, but it’s been on their website for at least a year that I know of.

Bummed I’m going to miss VIMFP, but enjoyable to listen to you guys as always

-B

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #110 – June 5th, 2014 by Hunter http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2014/06/vegas-gang-110-june-5th-2014/comment-page-1/#comment-978 Sat, 07 Jun 2014 16:53:38 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=302#comment-978 Thanks!

Huh – hadn’t thought about the shooting. ’tis possible he just had enough.

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #110 – June 5th, 2014 by Paul Shanahan http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2014/06/vegas-gang-110-june-5th-2014/comment-page-1/#comment-977 Sat, 07 Jun 2014 04:28:59 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=302#comment-977 Great show guys. On May 15th two separate events happened in Las Vegas in which could explain why Dan Lee resigned from the Palms on May 23rd. The Cosmoplitan Hotel and Casino was sold to the Blackstone Group for $1.73 billion dollars. With Dan Lee’s
long time experience in the gaming industry he could provide an excellent hire for the Blackstone Group. Unfortuntaley later that day there was a party in a suite at the Palms with around 40 people or so and there was an argument and someone was shot and killed. After a crazy random event like this happens Dan Lee might not need the aggravation of running a casino anymore and resigned from the Palms to take some time off.

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #109 – May 3rd, 2014 by Hunter http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2014/05/vegas-gang-109-may-3rd-2014/comment-page-1/#comment-964 Fri, 09 May 2014 04:21:22 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=299#comment-964 Definitely.

DTG has a problem in not being a FSE member, they have no access to that land other than a wish.

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #109 – May 3rd, 2014 by Mitesh Damania http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2014/05/vegas-gang-109-may-3rd-2014/comment-page-1/#comment-963 Fri, 09 May 2014 02:16:56 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=299#comment-963 The Grand should have someone giving out $5 free play coupons or free appetizer with food purchase on Fremont with permission from Fremont of course. Also they need a sign saying Downtown Grand that’s visible from Fremont.

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #109 – May 3rd, 2014 by JeffinOKC http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2014/05/vegas-gang-109-may-3rd-2014/comment-page-1/#comment-959 Wed, 07 May 2014 11:20:26 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=299#comment-959 I tried, that’s why I’m so upset! I forgot I was driving on the highway and it ripped the top from the frame. Caused $5000 damage. And I got a $250 ticket. (I don’t think wreckless dumbassery is a real crime. I think the officer made that up.)

When in doubt (especially when in doubt!) hit record. We’ll figure out how to hear it.

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #109 – May 3rd, 2014 by admin http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2014/05/vegas-gang-109-may-3rd-2014/comment-page-1/#comment-958 Wed, 07 May 2014 01:16:22 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=299#comment-958 Then put the top up. 🙂

More seriously, this was recorded ad-hoc, live. The alternative was no podcast. When there are issues with sound quality, it’s not because we didn’t consider it or we didn’t care – it’s complicated and difficult. We spent a few minutes before we started getting it as good as we could. Complaints about sound quality aren’t very helpful.

This was a show we did for the people that came to VT10. Something special for them. We hit record for posterity.

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #109 – May 3rd, 2014 by Jeff in OKC http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2014/05/vegas-gang-109-may-3rd-2014/comment-page-1/#comment-957 Tue, 06 May 2014 23:31:28 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=299#comment-957 Loved the show, as usual. Best podcast ever.
But…
The volume in Dr. Dave’s segments was very low and difficult to hear. Just remember; every time you are recording that somewhere there is a person listening with their headphones on while driving with the top down. That’s what I was doing on the way to work this morning, and it made me think that many of your listeners are doing some version of the same thing. The best way to hear your in-depth communications is to be isolated from the rest of the world.

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #109 – May 3rd, 2014 by rob@skyyontherocks http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2014/05/vegas-gang-109-may-3rd-2014/comment-page-1/#comment-956 Tue, 06 May 2014 21:04:47 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=299#comment-956 I was honored to be a part of the audience for this special edition of Vegas Gang during #VT10. The chemistry between the hosts was on display with how easily the conversation flowed. Chuck saying that he just “loves this town,” hit home for me as I am sure that it did for others in the room as well.
See you in Vegas.
Rob

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #108 – April 24th, 2014 by Level42 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2014/04/vegas-gang-108-april-24th-2014/comment-page-1/#comment-953 Thu, 01 May 2014 19:38:26 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=294#comment-953 I’ve been also thinking about Boyd for Cosmo. While the primary Boyd customer is the $150 a day gambler from rural Iowa, surely they have visions of shedding that image and bringing in bigger players. Echelon is proof of that.

I also have wondered about Jeff’s Caesars theory…I feel like any other company in any other industry would have defaulted by now. How are they still operating other than having someone that is saying “I won’t let you default”? 2 years ago, I was forced to sell a company that had plenty of business and steady income, but no financial pro could figure out any way to find a path to profitability. The operational debt was just too high…and I had no investors willing to put any more money in. I don’t see how Caesars can still exist with its current portfolio of properties in 5 years without a major investor stepping up.

Bill…surely someone that seems to know as much about the industry as you do would know that it’s “Caesars” not “Cesar’s”…

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #108 – April 24th, 2014 by bob http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2014/04/vegas-gang-108-april-24th-2014/comment-page-1/#comment-952 Thu, 01 May 2014 02:32:46 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=294#comment-952 Jeff

Boyd’s middle class roots have not stopped it from doing really well operating the Borgota.

Cesar’s Entertainment cash flowed 1,876,000,000 last year. Let’s make the math simple and assign a generous multiple of 10 to these cash flows. So the market value of Cesar’s properties is about 19 billion. Cesar’s owes 37 billion. So Cesar’s is underwater.

So why would Apollo and TPG pump billions in to make the bondholders whole? Remember from the cash flow they have to fund property improvements like new carpets, beds, etc. so all that cash flow can’t go to paying down the debt.

These guys are strippers. They take money out at the beginning to cover their investment. If the deal works out they make a truckload of money. If it doesn’t move on.

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #108 – April 24th, 2014 by Jeff in OKC http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2014/04/vegas-gang-108-april-24th-2014/comment-page-1/#comment-951 Wed, 30 Apr 2014 23:50:20 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=294#comment-951 My love for Boyd is well documented. But…I think this is the worst possible fit; a customer base and business model that are 180 degrees opposed from their core. A property that is known for their edgy, hipster, only casually interested in gaming marketing plan that would be owned by a company that is all about aging, low roller gamblers. That would be like Sam Nazarian trying to make SLS work with his Sahara Rolodex.

Regarding Cromwell. I am developing a theory about Caesars debt structure; what if TPG and Apollo Management told Gary Loveman when they took the company private “We will not let you default”? He is instructed to do anything he can to cover the $10 billion strip-out, but if default becomes inevitable, they will step in and cover the debt. Through bond purchase, recapitalization or some other means, they will keep the company intact because it provides a solid ROI and they still have liquidity with the money they took. Make it as complicated as they want, but default and loss of property is not a proper use of the money.

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #108 – April 24th, 2014 by chuckmonster http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2014/04/vegas-gang-108-april-24th-2014/comment-page-1/#comment-948 Tue, 29 Apr 2014 00:30:31 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=294#comment-948 Would be an interesting move for Boyd… a brand new property without the construction finance debt. Would be a very shrewd call, right in their wheelhouse.

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #108 – April 24th, 2014 by Hunter http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2014/04/vegas-gang-108-april-24th-2014/comment-page-1/#comment-944 Sat, 26 Apr 2014 23:28:17 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=294#comment-944 Booze on the High Roller makes me wayyyy more interested.

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #108 – April 24th, 2014 by Steven http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2014/04/vegas-gang-108-april-24th-2014/comment-page-1/#comment-943 Sat, 26 Apr 2014 20:01:10 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=294#comment-943 The High Roller does allow booze onboard, the thing is you won’t be allowed to carry your leg-shaped plastic cup filled with frozen goodness bought moments earlier at Purple Zebra. There is a bar where drinks can be procured before getting onto the High Roller.

A thought regarding the social gaming discussion. The entertainment properties that slot makers are getting licensing on are properties that for the most part are aimed towards the Gen X crowd either via nostalgia (For example, Ferris Bueller’s Day Off, Cheers, Top Gun, Back To The Future, Ghostbusters, and Michael Jackson) or pop culture (For example, Avatar, Lord Of The Rings, Sex In The City, Pawn Stars, True Blood, The Walking Dead, Bridesmaids, The Dark Knight, American Idol and Titanic.). Some properties that are currently being licensed for slot machine like Star Wars and Marvel (Iron Man and Spiderman) will soon be a thing of the past as Disney has opted to let the current licensing deals manufacturers had for Lucasfilm and Marvel properties expire and not renew them.

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #108 – April 24th, 2014 by admin http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2014/04/vegas-gang-108-april-24th-2014/comment-page-1/#comment-942 Sat, 26 Apr 2014 19:56:14 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=294#comment-942 Boyd – interesting thought!

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #108 – April 24th, 2014 by bob http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2014/04/vegas-gang-108-april-24th-2014/comment-page-1/#comment-941 Sat, 26 Apr 2014 11:02:57 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=294#comment-941 A couple comments.

One, I looked at the report Dr. Dave posted and ran a couple of comparisons.

According to the report adjusted for inflation national gaming revenues increased five percent while Nevada revenues decreased 10% from 2001 until 2013. But in that time frame total profits of Nevada casinos decreased from a profit of 554 million to a loss of 1,349 million.

From 1999 (I did not see the 2001 numbers on the website) until 2013 the average gaming revenue per room night dropped 21% adjusted for inflation. So I think the mix of customers changed. The casinos replaced many of the heavier gamblers started staying closer to home and were replaced by conventional tourists with far less interest in gambling, with disastrous results for industry profitability.

A couple other things. The Cromwell is supposed to go to the new Cesar’s Acquisition Corporation. The properties that the old corporation is supposed to sell to the new corporation are priced at four to five times cash flow, not the industry standard of seven.

And the logical landing place for the Cosmopolitan is Boyd. I don’t know if they have the resources even at a discounted price, 600 to 700 million but they have a strong regional market to feed the property and it would give them a facility comparable to the Echelon at pennies on the dollar.

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #107 – March 19th, 2014 by bob http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2014/03/vegas-gang-107-march-19th-2014/comment-page-1/#comment-680 Fri, 28 Mar 2014 12:12:30 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=292#comment-680 I am neither wealthy nor Chinese but I don’t think a lot of Chinese gamblers will stay at the SLS as a favor to their investor friends. In fact, I don’t think many Sahara investors will. The surrounding neighborhodd will scare then away. These people bought a residence visa for $500,000, which for them is a fair price for the security that a U.S. provides. That’s all they care about.

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #107 – March 19th, 2014 by Paul Shanahan http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2014/03/vegas-gang-107-march-19th-2014/comment-page-1/#comment-646 Thu, 27 Mar 2014 06:54:58 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=292#comment-646 The salesaman I used to work with in Las Vegas in the mid 90’s really liked the El Cortez and him and his wife used to gamble there all the time. They had a nice write up here in the Chicago Tribune about Mr. Gaughan. RIP Jackie Gaughan.

SLS Las Vegas will be interesting to see how it does when it opens in September. The location is questionable but maybe Mr. Nazarian can get his property up and running and make it profitable.

Great show guys.

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #107 – March 19th, 2014 by Marty http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2014/03/vegas-gang-107-march-19th-2014/comment-page-1/#comment-620 Tue, 25 Mar 2014 17:42:13 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=292#comment-620 Caesars financial issues haven’t been an issue getting licenses because they are in joint ventures. In the case of Maryland, the debt is brought up by the commission and Caesars will be reviewed every year because of it. But at the same time, Caesars barely owns 50% of the Baltimore Casino. Dan Gilbert’s Rock Gaming is just as important of an investor. That joint venture is then paying Caesars a management fee to run the casino. If something were to go south, Gilbert could just buy more shares while still paying CZR a management fee.

Ohio is a similar situation. Gilbert owns 80% of the stock of the Horseshoes and Thistledown Racino there. But they pay CZR a management fee. In both MD and OH, Caesars is basically paying itself in some form. Also, keep in mind that Gilbert already holds a large share of Caesars Interactive. It wouldn’t surprise me to see Rock Gaming get more involved with Caesars and use these same agreements to help prop up Caesars.

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #107 – March 19th, 2014 by Dr.Dave http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2014/03/vegas-gang-107-march-19th-2014/comment-page-1/#comment-617 Mon, 24 Mar 2014 00:25:06 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=292#comment-617 Jeff–that’s a point that I’ve been wanting to make about the SLS investor pool. It really is a throwback to the days when the syndicate owners were also big players. Of course, few today like to draw parallels to that era because of the “undesirable” affiliations, but I think it’s an interesting case of convergent evolution. In the 1950s and today, the property had the same problems–capital and marketing–and both times a solution was found to (partially) solve both. Fascinating.

As far as Downtown Grand and walkability, that doesn’t seem to be an issue for the El Cortez, which seems packed whenever I’m in there, and it a longer walk. You could argue that it’s energized by East Fremont, but there doesn’t seem to be too much overlap there. Either people are walking, or the El Cortez is getting lots of locals to drive and park–judging from the always-full garage, that’s definitely part of the answer.

What that tells me is that, with its better location and proximity to a landmark, the (slow) traffic problems at DTG are not insurmountable.

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #107 – March 19th, 2014 by JeffinOKC http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2014/03/vegas-gang-107-march-19th-2014/comment-page-1/#comment-616 Sun, 23 Mar 2014 22:34:45 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=292#comment-616 I apologize for leaving so many comments, but it takes me quite a while to write them and I don’t have a lot of free time during the day.

Regarding SLS: Seems to me that they are aiming for 3 separate markets out of the gate. First is the Los Angeles market, because they are based there and have so many brands that operate there and will have locations in Las Vegas. In theory, they would draw a drive in customer who wants to visit their “known” brand and is more inclined to stay on property. Second, the nearby locals market. This includes a pretty dense and high income condo tower subset within walking distance, and a pretty good income group within 3 miles driving distance. Third (and the greatest wild card) are the 800 asians who invested 1/2 million dollars each in the eb 5 program. 800 asians who are probably in the top .01 percent of their home populations, who are probably civic leaders and titans of business and are telling everyone they see at the country club and who works for them that “I got a piece of a Vegas casino-the SLS. Be sure and go there when you visit Las Vegas. Tell all your friends too, OK?” This same approach worked back in the day when it was the Sahara getting the home builders and overcoat factory owners from Philadelphia to invest.

I think these are 3 good groups who can help them overcome the isolated location issue people have been so concerned about. Not cure it, or be the entire customer base, but help it.

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #107 – March 19th, 2014 by JeffinOKC http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2014/03/vegas-gang-107-march-19th-2014/comment-page-1/#comment-615 Sun, 23 Mar 2014 17:43:03 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=292#comment-615 Hunter made the observation that Downtown Grand is not getting people into the casino. Having stayed there a couple weeks ago, I have to agree with him. This is most concerning to me, due to my thoughts that it was the classiest and most enjoyable place downtown. We loved everyting about our stay and want other people to enjoy it also and make it very successful.

I think a big problem for Downtown Grand is getting people to walk the 1/2 block from the Fremont Street Experience to Downtown Grand using the 3rd Street sidewalk. I suggest Downtown Grand pay the cost to remove the “shoot the basketball 20 to 30 feet in the air” midway attraction; rent the 2 little retail spaces on the east side that appear to have been closed for years, and put some kind of attractions in that space that could draw people that direction and make a little income; and use signage and furniture to draw peoples attention that direction. Basically do everything they can to make people look that direction.

Because one of the first obstacles to the Downtown Grand project was mayor Oscar’s concerns that the walkway between the DTG towers blocked the view to the Mob Museum, I think the City of Las Vegas wants people to look and walk that direction in order to draw people to the museum. I think an attractive makeover of that space would draw people to both places. Now, the question might be if FSE has a problem with people leaving their area to visit other places? I suggest that the words of Jackie Gaughan would apply “If it’s good for Las Vegas, it’s good for all of us.”

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #107 – March 19th, 2014 by bob http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2014/03/vegas-gang-107-march-19th-2014/comment-page-1/#comment-611 Sat, 22 Mar 2014 17:21:36 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=292#comment-611 I think Baltimore is in the “solvent” group because the new casino is only supposed to cost $450M or so. My understanding of gaming economics is that is a casino can gross north of 50% of it’s building cost a year will probably be profitable. Maryland Live is grossing a little over 600 million a year. So Caesar’s Baltimore only has to do about 40% of what Maryland Live grosses to be profitable. I think that they can do that pretty easily.

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #107 – March 19th, 2014 by toastcmu http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2014/03/vegas-gang-107-march-19th-2014/comment-page-1/#comment-609 Sat, 22 Mar 2014 17:04:56 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=292#comment-609 Have to agree with Chuck on the Gaughan legacy – While I enjoy a nice place with the missus once in a while when I visit, the practical part of me likes to be frugal, so we’ll typically split our time between a place like The D and a nice place on the strip. Renting a car (since I’m an east coaster) allows me to drive to the nice places to eat, and not have to deal with the circus that the Strip has become.

Regarding the CZR shuffle game, I’m curious as the new Horseshoe in Baltimore is part of the “solvent” group. When MGM joins the party in 2016, and revenue decreases, I’m curious what happens at that point in the game? Certainly with the lack of maintenance anymore, those free rooms aren’t worth it in my view.

Finally, instead of FinCen, I kept hearing RenCen, but that might be because of Detroit on the brain lately.

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #107 – March 19th, 2014 by rob@skyyontherocks http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2014/03/vegas-gang-107-march-19th-2014/comment-page-1/#comment-608 Sat, 22 Mar 2014 15:49:33 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=292#comment-608 Someone once told me that if table salt and/or sugar was just invented and had to gain FDA approval to hit the market, neither one would stand a chance of getting through. I wonder how the gaming board feels about the Caesars financial situation? Would they grant a license if Caesars did not have a legacy position? At what point should consumers worry about cutbacks such as personal security, safety, or sanitation issues around the properties? I would also be interested in the P&L of the individual properties owned by them in LV to see which ones are performing, or under-performing.
Thanks to Jeff in OKC for reminding me about Annette Haven. Annette, combined with the sure bet of Apple TV, gives me another thing to do to keep me busy in between trips to Las Vegas.

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #107 – March 19th, 2014 by bob http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2014/03/vegas-gang-107-march-19th-2014/comment-page-1/#comment-606 Sat, 22 Mar 2014 13:10:36 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=292#comment-606 Is there a standard, rule of the thumb number that a casino should reinvest in their buildings. For example, grocery chains usually large retailers usually reinvest three per cent of sales in capital expenditures.

The reason I ask is that in the latest Caesar’s conference call Loveman acknowledged that Caesar’s continually cuts their capital budgets through out the year. I don’t think much has been done in the last seven years at Caesar’s properties and don’t believe much will be in front of the debt that comes dues on 2018. So I think that properties deteriorate.

And my bet-literally, I bought stock- is that the new company is given the nice profitable assets and the old company is mailed back to the creditors.

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #107 – March 19th, 2014 by JeffinOKC http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2014/03/vegas-gang-107-march-19th-2014/comment-page-1/#comment-594 Fri, 21 Mar 2014 04:26:39 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=292#comment-594 Couple quick observations:
1. Chuck mentions VTX and my mind hears VCX. I am instantly transported to 1980, with visions of Annette Haven and big bush boners.
2. Regarding the Admiral’s hood ornament: The Spirit of Ecstasy is very expensive and it is not surprising that someone would take it.

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #106 – February 14th, 2014 by detroit1051 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2014/02/e-106/comment-page-1/#comment-571 Sun, 16 Feb 2014 03:48:12 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=290#comment-571 I never heard of Pizza Rock before, but after hearing Brock Radke talk about the Chicago Thin Pizza, I checked the website. The menu looks great. Didn’t know they used different oven temps for different pizzas.

]]>
Comment on “That’s a Really Great Question”, Vegas Gang #105 – January 15th, 2014 by chuckmonster http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2014/01/thats-a-really-great-question-vegas-gang-105-january-15th-2013/comment-page-1/#comment-563 Wed, 22 Jan 2014 19:28:16 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=287#comment-563 @motoman Thank you! After 9 years of swimming in the Trippies data, trends become apparent yet the decisions are more elusive. I’m always surprised by the readers poll results.

@bob data mining requires miners and data, something newer independent properties don’t need or can’t buy, hence the cross marketing contracts between X casino and Y signature collection of properties.

The ‘big data’ mining advantage as held by the megagloms like Caesars and MGM are at least 15 orders of magnitude greater – an ocean to a drop… but all that information means nothing if the response to it is glacial. Perhaps the boutique owner has the advantage here… but unfortunately Revel & Cosmopolitan aren’t built to boutique scale… heads in the beds (food & water) is their primary concern.

The casino owner who can analyze, discern and respond to massive data nimbly and effectively will revolutionize the industry. Perhaps this explains the majesty and power of the rhinoceros.

]]>
Comment on “That’s a Really Great Question”, Vegas Gang #105 – January 15th, 2014 by bob http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2014/01/thats-a-really-great-question-vegas-gang-105-january-15th-2013/comment-page-1/#comment-557 Wed, 22 Jan 2014 01:20:57 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=287#comment-557 Referencing your discussion of Atlantic City gaming results I have a hypothesis that I would like to run by the panel.

At a typical resort hotel in Hawaii or Bali or wherever two guests staying in identical rooms are about equally profitable. They will pay the same amount for the room and about the same for food and drink.

Not so at a resort casino. The profitability of the customer varies greatly based upon his gambling drop. Thirty years ago casinos did not really know who were their most profitable customers.
The casinos would know some really high roller but they would probably not realize that Charlie from Chicago who came a couple times a year and dropped an average of 5K a trip while Bob from Denver came to hit the five dollar prime rib specials, the cheap shows and play nothing but $2 blackjack (those were the days).

Now, with the customer card programs the casinos know who the profitable customers and in the face of competition will comp the hell of the profitable customers like Chicago Charlie. The new market entrant will largely attract the unprofitable customers like Denver Bob because of a lack of good customer data. The new entrant get stuck with the unprofitable customers like me.

We have seen the Revel and Gold Nugget in Atlantic City and the Cosmopolitan open to abysmal casino results. Which leads me to believe that the existing entrants in the industry have built a formidable barrier to entry and that we sadly we now have an oligopoly of the existing large casino companies. The Kirk Kerkorians, the Sheldon Adelman’s and other great entrepreneurs are a thing of the past.

]]>
Comment on “That’s a Really Great Question”, Vegas Gang #105 – January 15th, 2014 by Motoman http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2014/01/thats-a-really-great-question-vegas-gang-105-january-15th-2013/comment-page-1/#comment-547 Mon, 20 Jan 2014 20:38:41 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=287#comment-547 Chuck,
Your explanation of the Trippies selection process was very thorough, insightful, and above all helpful. Thank you.

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #103 – December 14th, 2013 by Jeff in OKC http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2013/12/vegas-gang-103-december-14th-2013/comment-page-1/#comment-524 Tue, 24 Dec 2013 01:13:40 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=279#comment-524 I love Las Vegas casinos, but don’t gamble much. Just love the experience of being in them. From the Cosmopolitan to the El Dorado, I just love being there and checking them out.
We made a visit to the Lucky Club in North Las Vegas last summer. Legend had it that is was a very rugged and coarse place. So I was very concerned about dragging my poor wife to another shithole in my quest for “adventure”. I was very pleasantly surprised. I’m not saying it was the Wynn, but it was a nice, clean and safe environment. Good gambling odds, good players club benefits and good food at the restaurant. I know it was good because a regular customer corralled us walking down the hallway and told us “It’s really good!”
I’m not a Seth Schorr expert, but one I can say from our time in the Downtown 3rd area and Lucky Club is that he provides a better experience and value than the market segment should expect. That is a compliment to him and his team.

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #103 – December 14th, 2013 by Rob @ skyyontherocks http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2013/12/vegas-gang-103-december-14th-2013/comment-page-1/#comment-523 Sun, 22 Dec 2013 02:18:52 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=279#comment-523 Very interesting piece of work. Interesting that he agreed that there are two types of downtown visitors. Based on what I have heard so far, Grand is trying to be sort of like Cosmo where good gambling is secondary to a good experience. Cosmo seems to have realized that as a mistake and is trying to make its casino more relevant. I am excited to see the property but I suspect when I want to gamble I will walk over to The D or the El Cortez. Regardless, the downtown area continues to steal most of the exciting headlines.

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #104 – December 19th, 2013 by detroit1051 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2013/12/vegas-gang-104-december-19th-2013/comment-page-1/#comment-522 Sat, 21 Dec 2013 19:13:18 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=284#comment-522 Great interview. In my simple mind, the only thing I knew about Andrew Pascal was that he is Elaine’s nephew. I figured nepotism must have played a role when he was at Wynn. Was I wrong! He is very thoughtful and had excellent insights, especially about the opening of Encore when the economy tanked. Also fun to hear about Jim Murren and Andrew being friends and neighbors. He sure gave a vote of confidence to the way Unwin is operating Cosmopolitan under difficult circumstances, and he couldn’t have been more positive about Rob Oseland at SLS.
Dr, Dave, next time, tell Hunter he owes you more time to ask your questions 🙂

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #103 – December 14th, 2013 by Jim http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2013/12/vegas-gang-103-december-14th-2013/comment-page-1/#comment-520 Thu, 19 Dec 2013 13:00:23 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=279#comment-520 Excellent interview!
I only wish you would have pointed out to Mr. Schorr that a big part of appealing to the locals is making them feel like they are getting a “good gamble” at your joint. The whole fiasco with downgrading their video poker pay tables shortly after opening got them off on the wrong foot in that department. With the proliferation of gambling info on the internet its not the small percentage of people it used to be who pay attention to this sort of thing. For me personally it means I wont consider staying or gambling there on one of my half dozen trips into town per year.

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #103 – December 14th, 2013 by admin http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2013/12/vegas-gang-103-december-14th-2013/comment-page-1/#comment-518 Sun, 15 Dec 2013 21:38:39 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=279#comment-518 Indeed. You can subscribe just as other podcasts. Here’s the link to iTunes:

https://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/vegas-gang-podcast/id197984456?mt=2

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #103 – December 14th, 2013 by Ron Mader http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2013/12/vegas-gang-103-december-14th-2013/comment-page-1/#comment-517 Sun, 15 Dec 2013 16:20:40 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=279#comment-517 Always entertaining, always informative! Is there an easy way to subscribe to the podcast from itunes?

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #103 – December 14th, 2013 by detroit1051 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2013/12/vegas-gang-103-december-14th-2013/comment-page-1/#comment-516 Sun, 15 Dec 2013 14:24:22 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=279#comment-516 I was surprised to hear Seth Schorr mention EB-5 financing. It’s becoming more common for casinos, including SLS.
http://www.eb5exclusive.com/eb-5-news-and-updates/tag/eb-5-seminole-casinos

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #103 – December 14th, 2013 by Phil http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2013/12/vegas-gang-103-december-14th-2013/comment-page-1/#comment-515 Sun, 15 Dec 2013 05:49:13 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=279#comment-515 One thing I noticed about the place when I ate there last week was 95% of the gamblers were age 45-70 yet the music they played seemed more alternative music meant for the Zappos crowd that was virtually non-existent there. I think I saw 2 people in their 20’s during my 3 hour visit. Because the design of the place lacks a ceiling (exposed vents) the music just bounces everywhere and seems overpowering. While in their coffee shop (forget the name), they had their own music and it was overpowered by the music played in the casino. Personally, when I’m eating, that’s my time to relax, I don’t want to hear competing sounds of loud music.

I love the fact that they had the porters there open the doors for their guests. That’s old school and unfortunately a rare sight anymore (I think 4 Seasons, Venetian/Palazzo and Mandarin are the only ones that do it anymore.)

It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to see they will struggle to get foot traffic during the winter months and will rely heavily on the warmer months to deliver the numbers. When I was there a week or so ago, they had live country concerts going on downtown and Fremont St. was surprising packed given it was 35-40F degrees out and yet it was a ghost town walking down N. 3rd St. to the Downtown Grand. I think in the winter months, people are willing to walk down Fremont as access to any hotel that is virtually ten feet away, but walking 1000 feet to the Downtown Grand is “tough” for the winter tourist. Again, in summer it should be much less of an issue.

Lastly, I’m glad we have some youth leadership like Seth and Tony Marnell that lived the what I feel was the last great decade of Vegas, the 80’s. Most of the rush of new Vegas residents or more importantly Vegas hotel employees the past couple decades are from other cities and don’t have any reference point to what the town was like in the past, so they push their own concepts of what they think Vegas should be, and for many that’s one of the keys to the loss of the town’s luster, whether it’s good for their stockholders or not.

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #103 – December 14th, 2013 by detroit1051 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2013/12/vegas-gang-103-december-14th-2013/comment-page-1/#comment-514 Sat, 14 Dec 2013 20:42:17 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=279#comment-514 I’m glad Seth Schorr gave you a full hour. I thought his comments about Macau’s Portuguese history and the Macanese culture were very interesting.

Chuck’s question, bringing in Brahms, was one in a million. Brilliant!

Seth brought back great memories when he talked about living in the Golden Nugget as a child. His references to Stefano’s with its singing waiters, and the elegant Lillie Langtry’s made me remember what an elegant property it was when Steve Wynn owned it.

All I know about Downtown Grand comes from your podcasts and press releases, but Schorr made it sound like he’s working on fine tuning it every day. I still don’t understand what this new Picnic venue will be.

Interesting hour. Thanks.

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #102 – December 7th, 2013 by IndyJeffrey http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2013/12/vegas-gang-102-december-7th-2013/comment-page-1/#comment-509 Mon, 09 Dec 2013 00:34:33 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=274#comment-509 I like the Monte Carlo for the same reason people like downtown — the good value is disappearing. Bring back the good value

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #101 – October 31st, 2013 by JeffinOKC http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2013/10/vegas-gang-101-october-31st-2013/comment-page-1/#comment-501 Sat, 09 Nov 2013 06:37:34 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=271#comment-501 @kevin. Seems to me that the City of Las Vegas (which starts at Sahara Ave and goes to downtown and areas north) and unincorporated Clark County (all of The Strip and going to Laughlin, plus) both seem to have an approach to owners of large properties that gives them a lot of leeway when it comes to finishing challenged projects. I think they have had more messes to clean up than any other area in the country in the post-war era, and they have usually made things work out.

However, I think that this Tower of Hubris that is the Fountainebleau is an assault on the landscape that must be removed. It can never be anything other than a big, ugly, blue blob.

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #101 – October 31st, 2013 by kevin http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2013/10/vegas-gang-101-october-31st-2013/comment-page-1/#comment-500 Fri, 08 Nov 2013 19:38:36 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=271#comment-500 doesn’t Vegas have some sort of derelict building code where the city will force the owner to tear down Fontainebleau? It seems crazy that the city would allow the strip to have such an eyesore on it indefinitely.

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #101 – October 31st, 2013 by bob http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2013/10/vegas-gang-101-october-31st-2013/comment-page-1/#comment-497 Mon, 04 Nov 2013 21:23:46 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=271#comment-497 Dave

Boyd’s has one big problem with expanding anywhere. They have an immense amount of debt and are heading to Chapter 11.

The three downtown casinos are only marginally profitable, even with the Hawaiian niche. The three downtown properties only cash flow about 35 million a year. They only get room rates of $34-$38 a night.

Which is why I think the Downtown Grand will not make it. They will not get high enough rates to make money off that hotel.

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #101 – October 31st, 2013 by chuckmonster http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2013/10/vegas-gang-101-october-31st-2013/comment-page-1/#comment-496 Mon, 04 Nov 2013 20:58:08 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=271#comment-496 Bob – you’re right on about Caesars shell (corporation) game. They’ve been playing this for ages. Eventually, they’ll run out of investors to screw and places to hide the debt.

Paul – I was about to add to the FB discussion Carl Icahn’s activist intentions as a large shareholder of Apple, but I feared Hunter’s head might explode.

JeffOKC, ever the jokcster –

All kidding aside. I loved a lot of Downtown Grand. The casino floor looks great. The pool deck will be a great addition. The high end suites are some of the best in the neighborhood. Plus, I’m fascinated by dt3’s real “urban” concept – the attractions, dining and entertainment are an actual neighborhood. dt3 is more city center than City Center.

When relaunching a hotel whose actual history is well documented, touting a fake history for it is inane. As discussed on the show, creating a creative narrative makes some kind of sense when trying to tie property concepts together, but those stories need to be left in the design room. Maybe they think that these little vignettes will make good fodder to content farm bloggers who will write about anything regardless of how inconsequential.

If I were the boss, I’d explain WHY someone should visit, answering “The Dad Question” I ask at live events. “From the time you arrive you’ll have an adventure ranging from heart pounding excitement to sublime relaxing reflection, creating a personal, unique experience that lasts long the after glow fades into half forgotten memories preserved in a digital junk drawer.” Then move on to each vertical of offerings before wrapping the whole thing in the value proposition and a cozy reminder of how Vegas is just fun anyways.

Who would’ve thought that casino marketing folks have no idea to how sell the idea that when you stay at their property, you’ll have a great time that will live with you forever.

Maybe I’m just a jerk.

Re: The standard room sizes, DG’s are slightly bigger than the Golden Gate rooms.

Re: Post VIMFP depression, one day I was a little blue, but it passed very quickly. I’ve got too much VT work to catch up on that was deferred while doing VIMFP planning!

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #101 – October 31st, 2013 by Paul Shanahan http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2013/10/vegas-gang-101-october-31st-2013/comment-page-1/#comment-495 Mon, 04 Nov 2013 11:20:39 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=271#comment-495 Another great show guys. It’s going to be interesting to see how many locals and tourists visit SLS at Sahara and the Strip when it opens. I wish Sam Nazarian luck and I have to admit once the Sahara closed I thought that property would be empty until around 2020 or so.

The Fontainebleau is just an enormous piece of junk and belongs somewhere in the vicinity of the World’s Tallest Thermometer in Baker, California. That being said Carl Icahn paid around $150 million dollars for Fontainebleau back in 2010 and he wants to make some money off the World’s Tallest Piece of Junk so it will sit empty for awhile. If there was ever a need for a “Greek Lightning” occurrence the Fontainebleau would be at the top of the list.

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #101 – October 31st, 2013 by Dr.Dave http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2013/10/vegas-gang-101-october-31st-2013/comment-page-1/#comment-494 Sun, 03 Nov 2013 17:17:11 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=271#comment-494 Bob–I think that as on the Strip, the visitor profile is changing. People just don’t have the same discretionary income to gamble that they did 7 years ago. Downtown doesn’t have the Asian high roller cushion that the Strip does, which makes this shift more obvious. Baccarat win is about 20% of the total Strip casino win in most months, which is incredible. If you cut that in half (to about where it was in 2005), the Strip numbers would be catastrophic.

From all indications that I can see, Downtown is full, but the people aren’t gambling the way they used to. A lot of this is because of the rise of Southern California tribal casinos, which really cut into the Downtown base. The Boyd properties are somewhat insulated because of their built-in Hawaiian trade (which might be why they haven’t been as aggressive with renovations–they feel they don’t have to be) but it’s hurt everyone.

I think that, as with markets like Atlantic City and Reno, there are still opportunities for long-term profitability–the owner just has to get in on the right terms and have realistic expectations.

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #101 – October 31st, 2013 by Jeff in OKC http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2013/10/vegas-gang-101-october-31st-2013/comment-page-1/#comment-493 Sun, 03 Nov 2013 00:30:45 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=271#comment-493 Great show, as usual. I find It getting better every episode. These are truly the salad days for the show. When VIMFP becomes as big as the New York Marathon, I hope you will look back fondly at these as simpler times.

I got the vibe that Chuck’s comments about the Downtown Grand had a negative undercurrent to them. As a body shop psychologist, I attribute this to a couple possible causes: 1. Post VIMFP depression. B. Fatigue from having a bunch of Wynn level high minded, self important BS pumped into him by young people who refuse to acknowledge that they are downtown casino managers, not owners. 3. His (our) seduction by the fine folk at the D has made him (us) overprotective of any perceived threat to their rise to the throne at the top of downtown properties. Or X. One of the pugs just pissed on the corner of the sofa and he knows even Febreze won’t get the smell out enough to where his wife won’t notice when she gets home, and there’s gonna be Hell to pay in about 2 hours.

Having snarked that, I agree with the sentiments expressed about the backstory silliness. Personally, I am a bare knuckles history fan, and anything else is a disservice. I fear this trend is a sign of a hipsterization of some parts of downtown, and I am concerned about that.

Please help me with one thing, if possible. Chuck’s comments left me with the impression that the Downtown Grand regular rooms are a small as the Golden Gate. Do you have any idea how large they are and how they compare with the standard rooms at Fremont Street hotels?

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #101 – October 31st, 2013 by bob http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2013/10/vegas-gang-101-october-31st-2013/comment-page-1/#comment-492 Sun, 03 Nov 2013 00:07:21 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=271#comment-492 I have a question and a comment.

1. My question is about the investment that is currently going into downtown Vegas. I understand that the idea of the new investment is to sell the entertainment experience, not just gambling. But gaming revenues are down one percent which indicates that traffic is not increasing significantly despite the capital outlays. I would think that if traffic really was materially increasing that we would see some increases in gaming. When it be time to conclude that the rebuilding downtown is a failure?

2. My comment is this. It is quite apparent what Cesar’s is doing. They have moved every property that is not underwater over to the new company. Cesar’s got local partners to put up the money for the the Ohio and Maryland casinos which are doing well. The fact that so few properties are moving to the new company is just an indication of how sick the rest of the company is. If additional properties were making money they would be moving to the spin off. Internet gaming should be quite profitable given the size of the company rewards program and the customer databases the company has.

Once the new company starts up owners of the old company will watch the company go into bankruptcy while they make their money at the new one.

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #101 – October 31st, 2013 by Hunter http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2013/10/vegas-gang-101-october-31st-2013/comment-page-1/#comment-490 Sat, 02 Nov 2013 04:22:37 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=271#comment-490 Interesting.

We recorded the same way but there were two differences:

– I used the brand new version of Apple’s GarageBand for the first time.
– I did a but more editing than usual.

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #101 – October 31st, 2013 by detroit1051 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2013/10/vegas-gang-101-october-31st-2013/comment-page-1/#comment-489 Sat, 02 Nov 2013 02:58:30 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=271#comment-489 Great episode, but first thing I noticed was how good the audio was. Sound quality was excellent.

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #100 – October 19th, 2013 – VIMFP 2013 by JeffinOKC http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2013/10/vegas-gang-100-october-19th-2013-vimfp-2013/comment-page-1/#comment-478 Sat, 26 Oct 2013 21:17:21 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=268#comment-478 Is the Grandissimo segment available anywhere?

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #100 – October 19th, 2013 – VIMFP 2013 by BeeeJay http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2013/10/vegas-gang-100-october-19th-2013-vimfp-2013/comment-page-1/#comment-477 Sat, 26 Oct 2013 02:47:54 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=268#comment-477 Stayed downtown for the first time ever just before VIMFP, at Golden Gate 10/11-10/14. I was very skeptical and I am now 100% sold. Split the majority of my time/gambling between Golden Gate & The D, and had a fantastic time at both. I will definitely stay downtown in the future and even if I am staying on the strip (on a comp or during the summer for pool scene), I’ll do the majority of my gambling at The D.

Downtown is the real deal.

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #100 – October 19th, 2013 – VIMFP 2013 by admin http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2013/10/vegas-gang-100-october-19th-2013-vimfp-2013/comment-page-1/#comment-476 Fri, 25 Oct 2013 04:25:27 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=268#comment-476 We definitely thank Zach for coming. I’ve spoken to Seth since the show and he reiterated his willingness to come on. We’ve also got another cool interview we’re cooking up. Some good stuff through the end of the year I think.

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #100 – October 19th, 2013 – VIMFP 2013 by admin http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2013/10/vegas-gang-100-october-19th-2013-vimfp-2013/comment-page-1/#comment-475 Fri, 25 Oct 2013 04:24:12 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=268#comment-475 Jeff,

We’re all for questions in general and are happy to answer them. As for doing audience QA during a live show, I’d say maybe. Depends on what else, if anything, we’d have to cut to get it in.

Hunter

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #100 – October 19th, 2013 – VIMFP 2013 by Jeff in OKC http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2013/10/vegas-gang-100-october-19th-2013-vimfp-2013/comment-page-1/#comment-472 Thu, 24 Oct 2013 23:54:44 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=268#comment-472 Sorry, I forgot to ask this last question. Would you consider allowing audience questions, if they are pre submitted and approved?

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #100 – October 19th, 2013 – VIMFP 2013 by Jeff in OKC http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2013/10/vegas-gang-100-october-19th-2013-vimfp-2013/comment-page-1/#comment-471 Thu, 24 Oct 2013 23:45:17 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=268#comment-471 I hope it goes without saying that I love the show, and especially loved this episode. I thought Conine did a great job in an almost impossible situation. Being a last minute, unknown, young corporate lackey filling in for the Son Of The Legend/Young Man On The Rise – Seth Schorr cannot be a success. The best we could hope for is someone who gives clean, solid info on the new property fittin’ to open and be witty enough to keep up when the Gang of hosts get on a roll. He did both well and left the impression that he has potential to Be Somebody in the casino industry.

Regarding Jeff Simpson: I miss his contributions and voice, and I complained loudly after his untimely death about the void in the show. But, I have noticed the last couple months that I like the show in it’s current format. I think you guys have found your collective voice and flow within the existing framework. I no longer think during a show “What about this? What about that? If Simpson were alive he wouldn’t let X slide.” Instead, I think “This is a great show done by smart guys. I like it.” You are doing a fine job and I thank you for all your efforts.

I hope to see everyone next year. Lord willing.

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #100 – October 19th, 2013 – VIMFP 2013 by chuckmonster http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2013/10/vegas-gang-100-october-19th-2013-vimfp-2013/comment-page-1/#comment-470 Thu, 24 Oct 2013 20:29:36 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=268#comment-470 detroit – We missed you! You are right, Derek and Nicole weren’t just hosts in VIMFP – they were eager participants. Derek attended VPP at the Flamingo as a fan, roughly around the time he was making his entrance into the casino industry.

elgin – not a day goes by when we don’t think about Jeff. the huge gaping hole left by his passing is still tender, nearly two years later. his knowledge, depth of experience and fearlessness are impossible to replace. perhaps if the right person organically came along we would consider it. not ruled out.

DoubleD – I agree with you. Zach had a command of the narrative of Downtown Grand and is a very witty and effective communicator. Folks seemed to uniformly like his presentation skills although I felt he was a little schmoozy. Who knows, perhaps that is his schtick – sardonic faux politispeak.

When we do interviews, I get the biggest rush with guests whose authenticity is unimpeachable… REAL people telling their real stories. Go back and listen to the episode with Anthony Marnell…. truly the gold standard.

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #100 – October 19th, 2013 – VIMFP 2013 by DoubleD http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2013/10/vegas-gang-100-october-19th-2013-vimfp-2013/comment-page-1/#comment-468 Thu, 24 Oct 2013 16:49:36 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=268#comment-468 Great interview…I thought that Zach did a pretty solid job of answering your insightful questions. Obviously, some of his answers were a bit cookie-cutter (“delivering value”), but he came off as an intelligent, interesting, and nice guy. He seemed like a good replacement for Seth.

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #100 – October 19th, 2013 – VIMFP 2013 by Elgin http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2013/10/vegas-gang-100-october-19th-2013-vimfp-2013/comment-page-1/#comment-466 Thu, 24 Oct 2013 15:57:41 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=268#comment-466 Great episode, Hunter, Chuck, and Dr. Dave. Just wondering if you’ll be doing another show fairly quickly given all the news on CET this past week. Just wanted more in-depth analysis of the Gansevoort debacle, shooting, and massive debt. Also, will you ever get someone like Jeff Simpson (with a reporting background) to your mix again? Of course, Jeff is irreplaceable. But I do miss the kind of business analysis and longtime familiarity with the town’s inner workings that Simpson brought to the virtual table.

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #100 – October 19th, 2013 – VIMFP 2013 by detroit1051 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2013/10/vegas-gang-100-october-19th-2013-vimfp-2013/comment-page-1/#comment-464 Thu, 24 Oct 2013 13:21:38 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=268#comment-464 1) Unfortunately, I wasn’t able to attend #VIMFP, but I felt part of it by way of Vegas Gang #100. I was hoping to hear Seth Schorr, but I was really wowed by Zach Conine. He knew all the facts and gave great information about Downtown Grand and downtown itself. I liked his comment, “Downtown is our amenity.” As he said (I’m paraphrasing), downtown is not a sub set of the Strip. Downtown is coming into its own. This thought was reinforced by Derek Stevens when he talked about how fast downtown is evolving, and he wants to wait a year or even two to make decisions on the courthouse property. Great, great show.

2) As I followed the daily progress of (and drinking at) #VIMFP, I kept having the same thought. Could anyone imagine the rapport you all had with your hosts at The D happening at any other property? I couldn’t visualize Jim Murren, Sheldon Adselson or Steve Wynn actually partying with you all and tweeting in real time like Derek and Nicole did. It emphasized to me how important personal involvement is in this business. From my outside perspective, Derek and Nicole Stevens went above and beyond in hosting #VIMFP. That is exactly why The D has become the real resort catalyst for downtown. Plus, it helps that they are Detroiters 🙂

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #100 – October 19th, 2013 – VIMFP 2013 by Eric http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2013/10/vegas-gang-100-october-19th-2013-vimfp-2013/comment-page-1/#comment-461 Wed, 23 Oct 2013 21:46:10 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=268#comment-461 Chjuck, thanks for the clarification! I missed the announcement on @vegasgang, and look forward to hearing from Seth on a future show!

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #100 – October 19th, 2013 – VIMFP 2013 by chuckmonster http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2013/10/vegas-gang-100-october-19th-2013-vimfp-2013/comment-page-1/#comment-460 Wed, 23 Oct 2013 20:56:07 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=268#comment-460 ^^ Sorry for the typo of your name Eric!

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #100 – October 19th, 2013 – VIMFP 2013 by chuckmonster http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2013/10/vegas-gang-100-october-19th-2013-vimfp-2013/comment-page-1/#comment-459 Wed, 23 Oct 2013 20:55:26 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=268#comment-459 Erjic – Seth cancelled on us two days prior to the event due to an unforeseen business trip to Miami. He sent Zach to pinch hit. It wasn’t discussed on the show and only announced via @vegasgang Twitter account the day before the event. He has agreed to be a guest on one of the next few Vegas Gang episodes.

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #100 – October 19th, 2013 – VIMFP 2013 by Charles in Richmond, VA http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2013/10/vegas-gang-100-october-19th-2013-vimfp-2013/comment-page-1/#comment-458 Wed, 23 Oct 2013 18:35:21 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=268#comment-458 I would have been interested to know who inherited the players club list from the old Lady Luck. Would have been a built in mailing list. I’ve got an old players club card but no contact from Downtown Grand so far.

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #100 – October 19th, 2013 – VIMFP 2013 by Eric http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2013/10/vegas-gang-100-october-19th-2013-vimfp-2013/comment-page-1/#comment-457 Wed, 23 Oct 2013 16:03:24 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=268#comment-457 I’m about 15 minutes in, great episode so far. Just curious — what happened to Seth Schorr? Zach seemed like a great guest, and certainly very knowledgeable about 5th Street Gaming and the Downtown Grand. But I just wonder why the last-minute switch? (Apologies if this is explained later in the show and I just haven’t heard it yet.)

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #99.99 – October 10th, 2013 by Dr.Dave http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2013/10/vegas-gang-99-99-october-10th-2013/comment-page-1/#comment-447 Sat, 19 Oct 2013 07:48:56 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=265#comment-447 It costs $15-$20 million to maintain a closed property (utilities, security, insurance, taxes etc), so that factors into the equation as well.

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #99.99 – October 10th, 2013 by Bob http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2013/10/vegas-gang-99-99-october-10th-2013/comment-page-1/#comment-443 Fri, 18 Oct 2013 01:01:27 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=265#comment-443 It is certainly true that a closed casino amkes no money. But do three casinos running 85% capacity make more money than four running 70% capacity? Especially if the business you lose are the customers picking up cheap rooms that are being dumped onto a travel website? At what point do the savings from running fewer buildings exceed any lost revenue?

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #99.99 – October 10th, 2013 by toastcmu http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2013/10/vegas-gang-99-99-october-10th-2013/comment-page-1/#comment-431 Wed, 16 Oct 2013 17:54:04 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=265#comment-431 Nice podcast -although I like for Hunter’s sure bet, how the VIMFP promo was playing in the background. Did the designers do that too? Have to agree with Jeff – while CZR has a large presence in AC, I’m curious what if any, debt are associated with those properties. I saw that they’re putting in some money to renovate the floor at Bally’s. Whether that can change anything remains to be seen.

-B

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #99.99 – October 10th, 2013 by JCookDC http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2013/10/vegas-gang-99-99-october-10th-2013/comment-page-1/#comment-430 Tue, 15 Oct 2013 21:55:08 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=265#comment-430 @Jeff – yes, the Maloof sale went through and closed (it looks like late May 2013). There is new ownership in place currently. Also, re: Dan Lee – it sounds like he was sort of unceremoniously outsted from Pinnacle. Would CZR or whomever be that quick to bring him on? Does he need to try and rehab Palms to fix up his image a bit? I honestly don’t know but find the story very interesting.

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #99.99 – October 10th, 2013 by JeffinOKC http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2013/10/vegas-gang-99-99-october-10th-2013/comment-page-1/#comment-429 Tue, 15 Oct 2013 01:50:33 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=265#comment-429 Although the Maloof family has agreed to a deal to sell, I don’t recall reading where it has actually closed. Since the last Maloof desperation deal was to sell to Seattle interests and keep a percentage, the movements have been followed very closely by the OKC media. Any NBA team in Seattle gets us off the hook, so to speak. I have the sense that one of the issues that NBA commissioner wanted cleared up before he retired was the Kings ownership, and more importantly, was keeping them in Sacramento. It also became clear IMO, that Maloof ownership was no longer welcome in the NBA.
Regarding Caesars closing any properties: A closed casino can’t make any money. Doesn’t matter what seems like a good move, I have to believe that Caesars has covenants that are based on every property being open and working.

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #99.99 – October 10th, 2013 by Dr. Dave http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2013/10/vegas-gang-99-99-october-10th-2013/comment-page-1/#comment-427 Sun, 13 Oct 2013 23:47:12 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=265#comment-427 Bob makes a good point. Looking at the promo expense numbers for last month, Resorts is being very, very generous.

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #99.99 – October 10th, 2013 by Hunter http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2013/10/vegas-gang-99-99-october-10th-2013/comment-page-1/#comment-426 Sun, 13 Oct 2013 04:39:44 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=265#comment-426 Bob,

Thanks for the reminder on the Kings. I clearly don’t follow baseball. 🙂

– Hunter

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #99.99 – October 10th, 2013 by bob http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2013/10/vegas-gang-99-99-october-10th-2013/comment-page-1/#comment-425 Sat, 12 Oct 2013 19:47:01 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=265#comment-425 A couple of comments.

The Maloffs sold the Sacramento Kings last spring.

And I think Dr. Dave answered his question about what drives casino traffic in his walk down the Boardwalk. Promotional discounts such as slot points are driving traffic.

Which leads to another question. I would think Cesar’s could make more money by closing a couple or casinos in Atlantic City and Las Vegas and using the data from their card programs to entice profitable customers into the remaining casinos. Why hasn’t this happened?

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #99.99 – October 10th, 2013 by Rob Taylor http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2013/10/vegas-gang-99-99-october-10th-2013/comment-page-1/#comment-424 Fri, 11 Oct 2013 19:17:08 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=265#comment-424 Great show!
Don’t ever underestimate the power of the Parrothead.
Everything Buffett touches seems to generate cash.
See you at VIMFP.
Rob@skyyontherocks

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #99.99 – October 10th, 2013 by detroit1051 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2013/10/vegas-gang-99-99-october-10th-2013/comment-page-1/#comment-423 Fri, 11 Oct 2013 19:04:55 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=265#comment-423 What a far ranging Vegas Gang! Of course, I’m in the middle of Grandissimo and savoring every page.

@chuckmonster’s Dan Lee post on Vegastripping.com was fascinating, but his expansion on speculation about Lee and CZR is even more so.

Dr. Dave’s Atlantic City comments were equally intriguing. I never thought about Mohegan Sun and Resorts Casino before. Made me look up the original story from a year or so ago. http://www.pressofatlanticcity.com/news/breaking/resorts-partnership-with-mohegan-sun-to-make-atlantic-city-s/article_8a96f402-e3cb-11e1-8649-0019bb2963f4.html

And, who would have thought I’d listen to Webstock or the Underscore Orchestra.

You guys outdid yourselves.

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #99.00 – September 19th, 2013 by In Monte Carlo, Back to the Past | Vegas Seven - David G. Schwartz http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2013/09/vegas-gang-99-00-september-19th-2013/comment-page-1/#comment-405 Wed, 25 Sep 2013 11:39:11 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=262#comment-405 […] you have heard the most recent Vegas Gang podcast, you heard my thoughts on Monte Carlo. In this week’s Green Felt Journal, I […]

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #99.00 – September 19th, 2013 by motoman http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2013/09/vegas-gang-99-00-september-19th-2013/comment-page-1/#comment-401 Tue, 24 Sep 2013 01:18:12 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=262#comment-401 Re: Monte Carlo. Heh, you guys were so hooked on the James Bond romantic image….

Y’know, we used to think of Bellagio in terms of:

1) the Fountains, and
2) Julia Roberts descending the grand staircase, meeting George Clooney, while waiting for Andy Garcia… all dressed to kill.

The reality?
Yeah, not so much…. 😉

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #99.00 – September 19th, 2013 by Dr. Dave http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2013/09/vegas-gang-99-00-september-19th-2013/comment-page-1/#comment-395 Fri, 20 Sep 2013 20:58:40 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=262#comment-395 Thanks! I was hoping my (French) Riviera trip report would not disappoint.

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #99.00 – September 19th, 2013 by detroit1051 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2013/09/vegas-gang-99-00-september-19th-2013/comment-page-1/#comment-394 Fri, 20 Sep 2013 19:45:14 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=262#comment-394 Great Gang. Seth Schorr should be excellent guest. Who would have thought a couple of years ago that Downtown would be such a success story, in large part due to last year’s guest (and this year’s host) Derek Stevens’ The D as well as Seth Schorr. Exciting times.

Really enjoyed Dr. Dave’s description of Monte Carlo, including putting its casino revenues in perspective.

So excited about MGM finally doing a spectacular update of The Mirage Villa 10.

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #95 – August 22nd, 2013 by Jeff in OKC http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2013/08/vegas-gang-95-august-22nd-2013/comment-page-1/#comment-372 Thu, 29 Aug 2013 18:12:22 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=259#comment-372 bob-
I agree that most newspaper sites generate a small percentage of the total ad revenue for the company, but I think that the Sun site is different in that the web content is much more of a complete regional information site than the print Sun, which IMO is a section of day old features. I recall almost all the stories running in the print Sun have been on the internet on one of the Greenspuns other imprints, or, in some cases, ran in print in the Las Vegas Weekly or Vegas INC. I just feel that the print Sun is a last-ditch effort to remain in the news-PAPER business.

I also feel that LasVegasSun.com is the best example of comprehensive news and information for a city or region. In this case it’s Las Vegas. The site may have plenty of fluff content (bikini shots and gossip stories, etc) but any comprehensive news source will have some of that. It gets eyeballs and mouse clicks, right? Stories like that will get much more global interest than the news of why neighborhood recycling is going from weekly to biweekly. But those stories are what makes a local news source. I think the news buzzphrase is hyper-local, but I think they have are just repackaging the basic reason newspapers, or local news websites exist; provide more, and better, information about your area than any other source.

I can’t figure out the net-net about the mechanics of the deal. Looks like the Greenspuns are currently paying Stephens Media $1.2 million a year when all is said and done ($2.5 mil/year paid out for the use of LasVegas.com and $1.3 mil/year back from the JOA). This makes me try to figure out of it is worth giving up $1.2 mil/year to the Stephens to be rid of the Sun, or saving paying $1.2 mil/year by the Greenspuns is worth giving up the Sun newspaper, and dumping the foundation of the family name?

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #95 – August 22nd, 2013 by bob http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2013/08/vegas-gang-95-august-22nd-2013/comment-page-1/#comment-362 Sun, 25 Aug 2013 04:20:12 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=259#comment-362 Sorry, typo, line 2 should read:

internet revenue is only about 13% of all newspaper advertising.

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #95 – August 22nd, 2013 by bob http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2013/08/vegas-gang-95-august-22nd-2013/comment-page-1/#comment-361 Sun, 25 Aug 2013 04:17:57 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=259#comment-361 Re: The Las Vegas Sun

I have no idea what the existing editorial staffing is but I know that internet revenue is only about 13% of internet advertising. I doubt that the Sun currently makes money. That is why I think the majority of the family wants out. The Graham family just bailed in Washington, for god’s sake.

Sp I think the print version dies and the Greenspan’s keep a community voice with a website. But the RJ has a lot more editorial feet on the ground and will probably crush it financially.
But given the trouble newspapers have had in picking up internet advertising I don’s see them being a major player editorially or in the advertising market.

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #95 – August 22nd, 2013 by Jeff in OKC http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2013/08/vegas-gang-95-august-22nd-2013/comment-page-1/#comment-360 Sat, 24 Aug 2013 21:47:51 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=259#comment-360 Seems to me that the path Schorr is taking is admirable. He has worked his way up from the bottom IMO. With the Opera House, Silver Nugget and Lucky Club, he is at the working class level. We went into the Lucky Club during our early July trip. I was impressed with how nice and clean it was. It was clearly aware of it’s blue collar base, so it wasn’t the Wynn, or anything. But I thought it was nicer than the Wildfires I’ve been in and maybe better than Arizona Charlie’s Decatur.

I think the sky is the limit for Schorr and it will mean something when we tell people 25 years from now that we met him when he was a little guy. After the Downtown Grand, then it’s off to the LVH, Riviera, and later, the TropiHooters will be thrust in front of him. At that point Steve Wynn will ask him to partner up on the Frontier site and he will be on the Cover of Forbes in a story titled “The Savant Of The Strip-How Everyone Wants To Be, Or Be With, Seth Schorr!”

One thing I do want to know is how Schorr & co. got the timeshare tower of the Lady Luck to give up? I have always heard that when a property goes timeshare it is almost impossible to go back, because every owner of a share is considered a real estate owner.

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #95 – August 22nd, 2013 by Ash http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2013/08/vegas-gang-95-august-22nd-2013/comment-page-1/#comment-358 Sat, 24 Aug 2013 21:08:02 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=259#comment-358 SJM had a monopoly on Macao gaming for so long, but they haven’t moved on from the old guys in smokey rooms since the megaresort era began there, so it’s certainly interesting to see them now trying to compete with LVS, Wynn etc.

Do you guys have any thoughts on the Macao companies starting to diversify their opeartions? Melco, are developing a property in Manilla’s ‘Entertainment City’ area, while Lawrence Ho has announced investment in the Russian city of Vladivostok.

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #95 – August 22nd, 2013 by JeffinOKC http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2013/08/vegas-gang-95-august-22nd-2013/comment-page-1/#comment-357 Sat, 24 Aug 2013 16:25:34 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=259#comment-357 Mike _ch Memorial Long Comment Alert:

Great show, as usual. You guys efforts make America a better place. Never forget that.

First, let me make clear that I am a big fan of Brian Greenspun. I think his ideas and efforts in the early part of this century were visionary and would have established his (and his family’s) legacy as worthy heirs of the mantle of their father, and one of the great leaders in the communications industry and American society. But…when the bottom fell out of his economy he was shown to be greatly overextended and the family lost something like 80-90% of their wealth. From billionaires to millionaires. Poof.

I think Greenspun has retrenched, and is still being surprised and forced to re-retrench. Almost daily, it seems. In reality, I don’t think the Sun has been an economic benefit to the family since the late 1970s; as their land development, cable TV system and TV station became big forces in the region. But it did give them a platform to be a prominent voice in any discussion regarding the region. And many times national and international issues, as well. I think that Brian Greenspun has carried his father’s belief that the Sun is the foundation of all their success and it is to be kept at any cost. And there is something more important and special about being a newspaper editor/publisher than a web site and leaflet company operator. I don’t think his siblings have the same level of love for the newspaper business.

I’m guessing that LasVegasSun.com operates profitably and pays for all the local newsroom operations. I’m guessing that the Sun newspaper pays for the comic strips and the editorials and columns from other cities. Since it seems that all the local content in the paper has run on .com a day or more earlier, I’m assuming it is charged to the web site 100%. A wild guess would be that the true cost of operating the Sun paper, in it’s current configuration, is about $300,000 a year. That would mean the paper gains about $1 million a year from the JOA. If true, this would be something that must gall the R-J ownership no end in these difficult times for the print business, and would be their reason to seek to end the agreement. Of course, that wouldn’t explain the Greenspuns interest.

I wonder what the value of LasVegas.com is? R-J owner Stephens Media currently owns it and leases it to Greenspun Media, who then sub leases it to the LVCVA, if I understand the structure correctly. I recall Stephens tried to make it a portal for all things Las Vegas and failed miserably. Seems like most of their Internet activities are not strong and print is their area of expertise. Stephens is giving LasVegas.com to the Greenspuns as part of the JOA dissolution and I think it’s the main part of the agreement. I haven’t seen anything else in the reports of the agreement that seem to have enough value to make it work for the Greenspun family.

It sure seems like the print version of the Sun is on it’s way out. It is just a matter of time, regardless of this latest issue. 8 pages of local features, editorials and New York, Washington and Los Angeles columnist reprints don’t seem like anything special. But I sure read every word when I am in Las Vegas! Go figure. I think Brian Greenspun needs to recognize the inevitable, give up the print edition, regroup around the web site and a weekly paper in the same size as their Las Vegas Weekly. I’m 55 years old, a huge newspaper fan, but I no longer have a special attraction to newsprint versions. I now prefer to read them on my iPad or any other electronic format. This is one time I think I am the wave of the future (old people going electronic) and the sooner the Las Vegas Sun goes all in for that format, the farther ahead of the competition they will be.

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #94 – August 15th, 2013 by Jeff in OKC http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2013/08/vegas-gang-94-august-15th-2013/comment-page-1/#comment-347 Wed, 21 Aug 2013 20:49:37 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=256#comment-347 If Boyd built it I would not hesitate to ride it. Because I know it will be reliable, dependable and solid. And move much slower, so’s not to excite their older customer base.

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #94 – August 15th, 2013 by Charles in Richmond, VA http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2013/08/vegas-gang-94-august-15th-2013/comment-page-1/#comment-346 Wed, 21 Aug 2013 14:06:49 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=256#comment-346 A recent article in Huff Post stated that it will never be built because it doesn’t use enough government money (your taxes/income) to enrich enough people. A phenomenon that the article describes as greed. Why spend only $1 billion when there’s the possibility of spending $30-$100 billion. As Deep Throat said, “Follow the money.”

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #94 – August 15th, 2013 by chuckmonster http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2013/08/vegas-gang-94-august-15th-2013/comment-page-1/#comment-343 Tue, 20 Aug 2013 21:16:37 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=256#comment-343 ^^ what if i told you that Boyd was building it?

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #94 – August 15th, 2013 by Jeff in OKC http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2013/08/vegas-gang-94-august-15th-2013/comment-page-1/#comment-341 Mon, 19 Aug 2013 19:59:03 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=256#comment-341 Golly, the Hyperloop sounds wonderful. Soon as I mow the yard with my electric hover mower, I plan to go across the lake to the Hyperloop station on the other side. Can’t decide if I’ll take the jet pack or amphibicar across the lake, or just drive around in my Wankle engine pickup truck.

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #93 – August 9th, 2013 by Michael (Jinx) http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2013/08/vegas-gang-93-august-9th-2013/comment-page-1/#comment-336 Fri, 16 Aug 2013 18:25:30 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=254#comment-336 Sorry, yes, I wasn’t clear. My point was that much of the explanation at the beginning of the interview was that the D needed to be lower on the OTA site, but in reality they weren’t very far down the list anyway, and I’d find it unlikely that they were behind most if not all strip properties.

I do think the most crucial point of the discussion was that the OTAs don’t get any of the resort fee revenue. While the taxes are different, there is a monetary benefit to classifying these fees as resort fee. (Beyond the obvious, nightly fee).

I also think that Derek clarifying up front that comp rooms will not be charged it is a positive. One of the things that I think was most frustrating with MGM was that there never seemed to be a consistency.

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #93 – August 9th, 2013 by Jared http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2013/08/vegas-gang-93-august-9th-2013/comment-page-1/#comment-327 Sun, 11 Aug 2013 18:54:55 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=254#comment-327 That actually makes a lot more sense. Certainly, the Quad and probably Flamingo/Bally’s could appear to be priced competitively mid-week if the addition of a resort fee allowed CZR to manipulate prices, I could see that.

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #93 – August 9th, 2013 by admin http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2013/08/vegas-gang-93-august-9th-2013/comment-page-1/#comment-326 Sat, 10 Aug 2013 21:53:54 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=254#comment-326 Ah, so my understanding of what he was saying was that Caesars, with their resort fees, did indeed manipulate/change rates, especially midweek for some Strip hotels putting them far closer to Fremont hotels, at least in terms of the non-resort fee portion… and when customers see Strip and Fremont hotels at basically the same prices… well…

That’s what I took away from it, though I don’t have any data to verify if that’s actually the case.

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #93 – August 9th, 2013 by Jared http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2013/08/vegas-gang-93-august-9th-2013/comment-page-1/#comment-325 Sat, 10 Aug 2013 21:42:17 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=254#comment-325 I wonder if Jinx brings up Caesars b/c Derek mentioned CZR adding a resort fee as sort of being a ‘game changer’ within the industry. But, to the above point, if Caesars added the fees at their properties, but didn’t lower the room rates, how would that hurt Derek’s hotel? His rates were still below the CZR properties. Maybe I’m off though. If anything, CZR adding resort fees simply increased the out-of-pocket expenses of customers whereas Derek claims that won’t be happening (although it absolutely will on weekend stays).

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #93 – August 9th, 2013 by admin http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2013/08/vegas-gang-93-august-9th-2013/comment-page-1/#comment-324 Sat, 10 Aug 2013 16:07:18 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=254#comment-324 Hey Jinx,

Thanks for the comment, though I’m not totally sure I’m following the first paragraph.

Did someone say that Caesars claimed they would lower rates? Also, do you not believe that people sort hotel results by price and thus find that rationale unbelievable?

I feel like I’m not getting what you’re trying to say. It could be me, I’m kinda dense sometimes. Cheers.

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #93 – August 9th, 2013 by Michael (Jinx) http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2013/08/vegas-gang-93-august-9th-2013/comment-page-1/#comment-322 Fri, 09 Aug 2013 20:33:48 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=254#comment-322 Appreciate the interview, but one thing I’d like to point out, Caesars never claimed that resort fee was to get their rates lower on the 3rd party provided sites, and I’m not sure “the D” was showing up on page 2 of most hotel sites for lower price.

Having said that, I don’t fault “the D” for implementing a fee. I do like that they made it a flat $20 and that they did lower most of their prices as they said they would. I also appreciate the fact that they are clear in not charging it for a comp room.

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #92 – July 25th, 2013 by kevin http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2013/07/vegas-gang-92-july-25th-2013/comment-page-1/#comment-321 Thu, 08 Aug 2013 17:33:14 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=247#comment-321 I LOL’ed at the “Loveman has deferred maintenance” comment. Everyone at work turned and looked at me like I was demented.

Perhaps he will be staring in a hipster Cosmo ad soon?

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #92 – July 25th, 2013 by TooFarFromVegas http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2013/07/vegas-gang-92-july-25th-2013/comment-page-1/#comment-303 Thu, 01 Aug 2013 02:38:14 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=247#comment-303 @Dave, great points in re: the imperfections in Nevada’s Libertarianism. May I add to it: The State of Nevada’s blatent rent seeking in preventing other states having the same rights Nevada has to book sports bets (i.e., the whole PASPA, New Jersey case continuum). Btw, I’d love for you guys to dedicate some airtime to the state of the sportsbook in casino property strategy. I for one make my stay decisions almost solely on sportsbook but I get the sense the window has been in a consistent state of deemphasis. I’d love to get your respective thoughts on who you think does it right and whether there is untapped potential to revitalize the -book(s).

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #92 – July 25th, 2013 by Dr. Dave http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2013/07/vegas-gang-92-july-25th-2013/comment-page-1/#comment-300 Tue, 30 Jul 2013 16:51:59 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=247#comment-300 @toastcmu: I think that LVS not getting involved with online play is a strategic misstep. But, I guess after more than a decade of hits, they are entitled to one or two.

As far as the boycott goes, it never made much sense to me. If no one played poker there and the room closed, they’d probably be doing Sheldon a favor (short term) by letting him put in more slots or another restaurant/boutique in the same with guaranteed rental income.

I’m probably going to write a bigger piece on this for Seven, but the problem with the way most player “advocates” approach poker legalization is that they assume that it’s a matter of dire importance to everyone, when in fact most people a) don’t want to play poker online and b) don’t really care if other people do or don’t. I guess things like the boycott might rally a few like-minded people, but if you’re just doing it to “raise awareness,” why be so serious about it?

After all, all it took was a little impromptu #vimfp demonstration to get Caesars to (a href=”http://www.vegastripping.com/news/blog/4768/tourist-group-stages-protest-at-foot-of-paris-balloon/”>”paint the balloon.”

I understand that a lot of people make their living from poker and feel very strongly about this, but at the end of the day I always remember that there’s a reason they call it the “gaming” industry.

Re: Nevada-style gambling being a triumph of liberalism: Dotty’s and William Hill (sports betting kiosks) are strong evidence to the contrary. I’ve discussed this in class before (and will do so again), and usually come to the conclusion that Nevada’s embrace of gambling is far from libertarian–in fact, regulatory barriers to entry and legislative set-asides (see above) effectively make the gambling business in Nevada anything but a free market.

Comparatively, with no cap on licenses, Nevada’s gaming market is much freer than those in other states, but it’s still relatively circumscribed by regulatory and legislative structures that, for better or worse, favor the established operators.

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #92 – July 25th, 2013 by Ted Newkirk http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2013/07/vegas-gang-92-july-25th-2013/comment-page-1/#comment-297 Sun, 28 Jul 2013 12:05:48 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=247#comment-297 Aaying MD seeming “just fine” without smoking is subjective. No A/B testing.

Revel is an example A/B testing and I believe that we’ll learn quite a bit from it.

Silver City Casino here in Las Vegas — on the Las Vegas Strip — tried being smoke-free back in the day, and the smoking ban lasted (if memory serves me correct) about 5 months. Granted… it was not a high-end property, but back then, that area of The Strip had decent foot traffic.

That “bad taste” may still be an issue when any property thinks about going smoke-free. Even if it was a long time ago. Plus if I remember, Laughin properties who did areas of smoke-free gaming had issues and abandoned that idea.

Gambling is all about freedom. Libertarian style freedom. As both Chuck and Hunter essentially chimed in, you feel like you are in a REAL casino when you sense/smell smoke.

Per Dr. Dave’s comments about Hard Rock mailers to him in Henderson (since those old comments are closed):

The only reason I believe they are targeting that area is because it is essentially a short freeway and airport tunnel ride from them. And/or some consultant has convinced them that that Green Valley is full of people who are really hip and cool and visit the tourism areas often.

Maybe RIO on snail mail is so cheap, they can just carpet-bomb everyone. (Which is may be). Which makes one wonders why North Strip properties are not doing the same. Which they probably will now and I won’t get a dime for the advice. (They know where to find me… they need more than mailers to turn things around).

And in the “Comments Closed” but I’m catching up category:

Ya… the “Chuck Hates Everything” is a pretty common thought here. Like Vegas Rex before him. Except that Rex lived here and still sniped.

Our Clark County, Nevada capitalistic, “sell the tourism” driven society dates back to the Rat Pack days can’t can’t be quantized. Some enjoy it, some want to make their name kicking it in the nuts. I respect everyone making a living off of our crazy town.

Shots, shots, shots, shots, shots, shots, shots, shots, shots, shots… Everybody!

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #92 – July 25th, 2013 by toastcmu http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2013/07/vegas-gang-92-july-25th-2013/comment-page-1/#comment-296 Fri, 26 Jul 2013 20:41:21 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=247#comment-296 Re: smoking in casinos – while NV and Las Vegas are worried about the impact of non-smoking, here in the midatlantic, MD seems to be doing just fine with a no smoking rule in all casinos. That being said, I can understand why those in NV are worried, since there is so much competition.
On a side note, what do any of you think about Uncle Sheldon’s comments regarding “internet” gambling and the ‘boycott’ by Nolan Dalla that didn’t appear to really have an impact?

Good job as always,
-B

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #91 – June 28th, 2013 by Dr.Dave http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2013/06/vegas-gang-91-june-28th-2013/comment-page-1/#comment-288 Mon, 08 Jul 2013 01:46:31 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=244#comment-288 Something related to Ted’s comment about getting the Palms mailer: I live in Henderson-adjacent, so I’m pretty far from the Hard Rock. Yet I pass one of their billboards everyday (it’s on the 215 at around Warm Springs and a few weeks back got a beautiful, huge, glossy mailer filled with coupons of dubious value. I guess its a lifestyle thing, but even if they offered me a free meal, no strings attached, or $100 in freeplay, I wouldn’t trek up there. Of course, since I work down the street, I’d probably stop by for lunch, but that’s not the point. What I’m saying is that HRH is spending big bucks on an unfocused marketing campaign (I didn’t get the mailer because I have an HRH card, I got it because I’m a RESIDENT of my address). I’d really like to know what their ROI is on that.

Of course, other people without small kids like to do strange things like “go out” at night, so I might not be their target customer, but if I’m not, why are they spending money mailing to me? I wonder how many “hits” they need to get for the “locals marketing” thing to be considered a success.

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #91 – June 28th, 2013 by JeffinOKC http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2013/06/vegas-gang-91-june-28th-2013/comment-page-1/#comment-287 Sun, 07 Jul 2013 18:50:49 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=244#comment-287 Quick question I keep meaning to ask regarding the losses at the Cosmopolitan of Las Vegas: I recall reading that they have never made any payment on the property, and all losses are operational. It is implied that Deutsche Bank is sitting on a bigger loser than they want to discuss. Does anyone know if this is indeed the case?

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #91 – June 28th, 2013 by Hunter http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2013/06/vegas-gang-91-june-28th-2013/comment-page-1/#comment-283 Sat, 06 Jul 2013 22:26:39 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=244#comment-283 Thanks everyone for the great comments. Keep ’em coming!

]]>
Comment on Vegas Gang #91 – June 28th, 2013 by Dr. Dave http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/2013/06/vegas-gang-91-june-28th-2013/comment-page-1/#comment-282 Fri, 05 Jul 2013 23:41:46 +0000 http://www.vegasgangpodcast.com/?p=244#comment-282 @ thedavecat: I just looked at those. Maybe the 45 hotels will be inflatable: http://biz.yahoo.com/e/130603/tglld10-q.html

]]>